Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет LWN.net ([info]syn_lwnheadline)
@ 2014-06-23 19:36:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
[$] Questioning EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
There have been arguments about the legality of binary-only kernel modules
for almost as long as the kernel has had loadable module support. One of
the key
factors in this disagreement is the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() directive,
which is intended to keep certain kernel functions out of the reach of
proprietary modules. A recent discussion about the merging of a proposed
new kernel subsystem has revived some questions about the meaning and value
of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() — and whether it is worth bothering with at
all.


(Читать комментарии) (Добавить комментарий)