Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет LWN.net ([info]syn_lwnheadline)
@ 2019-06-14 16:04:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
[$] Dueling memory-management performance regressions
The 2019 Linux Storage, Filesystem, and
Memory-Management Summit
included a
detailed discussion
about a memory-management fix that
addressed one performance regression while causing another. That fix,
which was promptly reverted, is still believed by most memory-management
developers to implement the correct behavior, so a
patch
posted by Andrea Arcangeli in early May has relatively broad
support. That patch remains unapplied as of this writing, but the
discussion surrounding it has continued at a slow pace over the last
month. Memory-management subsystem maintainer Andrew Morton is faced with
a choice: which performance regression is more important?


(Читать комментарии) (Добавить комментарий)