Divide et impera

Magyar. Russian.

Nationalism is – at least in our ranks – generally speaking thought of as a solution to the internationalism of the Judeo-Christians and left-wing extremists. National pride. National identities. National culture. National languages et cetera.

We fight internationalists who wish to destroy the European species, and nationalism is the opposite of that, so why would we not?

Right-wing extremism is in our ranks generally speaking thought of as a solution to left-wing extremism too.

We fight left-wing extremists who wish to destroy the European species, and right-wing extremism is the opposite of that, so why would we not?

This sort of approach to the problems of our world is the rule. We identify a problem and then resort to the opposite of this problem to fight it.

Yet, we all agree that we don’t fight Christianity by embracing Satanism, because we understand that Satanism is just a false solution constructed by the Judeo-Christians to ensure that we don’t actually fight them or what they stand for: instead we enforce them by doing so!

So what if right-wing “extremism” and nationalism are actually similar constructs, intended to disarm us and even to make us fight for the enemy?

What is very interesting in this context is how much our enemies, i. e. the enemies of a European Europe, is propagating nationalism and right-wing extremism as their main challenge, the most dangerous thing in our world and so forth!

Why would we let them tell us what is the most dangerous to them?

Please join me in a time travel back to the pre-Christian Scandinavia…. For you to be able to join me we naturally need some music. No spell works without music, and we do need sorcery to travel in time… and a mind able to construct vivid images. Get up on that horse and ride back to the past with me… 

Give the spell some time to work (…)

So here we are, in pre-Christian Scandinavia, and what do we see? Do we see parliaments represented by opposing groups seated to the “left” and “right” in the parliament? No. Do we see any national banners? No.

We travel from what is today the border between Sweden and Norway and follow the coastline Northwards, and we meet tribes called the Ranii, the Raumi, the Granii, the Augandzi, the Eunixit, the Rugii, the Aroþi and the Adogit. All of them are of the same race, they all have the same language, the same culture, the same technology, the same religion and so forth, and none of them think of themselves as “Norwegians”. They don’t have a parliament with different political parties representing different views either; they only have individuals who all think of themselves as part of the same unit, the tribe, and who want to find the best solution for their tribe.

We wonder if it is the same elsewhere in Europe, so we ask one of them to help us get to what we think of as Ireland. To our surprise they understand well where we want to go, although they don’t recognize the name “Ireland”, because they have traded with the tribes living there for ages already. They transport us in well-made boats along the coast, past tribes identical to them in all respects, save perhaps that they speak other languages and call their deities by names in these other languages, and after only about a week of travel we arrive safely in “Ireland”.

In “Ireland” they have a different fashion in clothes, hairstyle and decorations, but other than that they are identical to the “Norwegians”. We travel all over “Ireland” and meet the Robogdii, the Darini, the Voluntii, the Blanii, the Menapii, the Coriondi, the Vodiae, the Uterni, the Iverni, the Velabri, the Luceni, the Concani, the Auteini, the Nagnate, the Erdin and the Vennicnii. None of them think of themselves as “Irishmen”. None of them have a parliament with different political parties representing different views either; they only have individuals who all think of themselves as part of the same unit, the tribe, and who want to find the best solution for their tribe.

All the tribes – in “Norway” as well as in “Ireland” and in all the other areas we pass on our journey – know that they have the same religion, the same culture, the same deities, the same customs, the same traditions, the same rites and – perhaps most importantly – the same blood and the same concept of Honour. They don’t identify with “Norway”, “Ireland”, “England”, “The Netherlands”, “Germany”, “Denmark” or “Sweden” or anything like that. Why would they? Does any of the “Norwegian” tribes have anything that matters in common with the other “Norwegian” tribes that they don’t have in common with all the other tribes of Europe too? Is the current fashion in “Ireland” of wearing torques a reason to think worse of them than of e. g. the Erulii – a tribe living in “Denmark” – who like the “Norwegians” perhaps don’t?

Let us return to our own age.

The tribes often fought against each other, so it was not a “peaceful co-existence”, because war is an important part of the human existence; we need war to test our men, simply to see if they are worthy of life and our trust. Those who ran away from battle in Ancient Europe were executed. They did not tolerate cowardice! The tribes united when they faced an external enemy though, like the Gauls under Vercingetorix of the Averni tribe and the South-Scandinavians under Arminius of the Cherusci tribe. The British tribes also united to fight off the Roman invasion force under the command of Julius Cæsar. We can assume that this was common; when several tribes faced the same threat they united and faced it together. Of course they did. Why would they not?

To keep the European tribes fighting each other rather than have them unite and turn against “you-know-who” they create new means all the time. One of the first they created was a concept of “nations”. Yes, the Judeo-Christians of today boast about this whenever asked about it: “There were no nations before Christianity”, they say – and for once they tell the truth. The Christians created the nations of Europe!

Now, if they created the nations, how can nationalism possibly be the solution to their internationalism? Hm…

With time they also created the party system and ensured that the tribes of Europe would fight each other inside each nation too. “Left” against “right”, “liberal” against “conservative”, and so forth. People even of the same families are kept busy fighting each other by this system, over absurd and completely irrelevant political questions, created of course to ensure that nobody see the real problems Europe face. The political left versus right concept too was created to ensure that the Judeo-Christians can keep on destroying Europe with minimal opposition. Those who could and should oppose them are busy fighting each other instead.

Now, if they created the “left versus right” concept, how can the “right” possibly be the solution to their “left”? Hm…

European “nations” fight against other European “nations”, and within each nation the different political parties fight each other too.

What keeps us from uniting and fighting against the real enemy?

Well, I can name a few things, and nationalism is certainly one of them (and “right wing extremism” is another – and different versions of Christianity is a third). European nationalists fight not for their race, religion and culture, but for this artificial Judeo-Christian construct called e. g. “Germany” or “Norway” or “England”.

During WWII Norwegian and Finnish SS-volunteers reported back to their tribesmen in “Norway” and “Finland” that it was surreal to see how their German colleges treated Ukrainians who were often much more “Aryan” than themselves like shit only because they had another nationality (and another version of Christianity). Blonde, blue-eyed, slender and beautiful Ukrainians were often treated like sub-human scum because they were not “German”.

That’s the fruits of this nationalism, that they present to us as the solution to internationalism.

Ukrainian “Untermenschen”? Or beautiful fellow Europeans? You tell me…

Even if we fight against the real enemy we will lose if we do so like nationalists, or like “right-wing extremists”. When all the Europeans face a common threat, like we do today and like we have done for 2000 years now, we must unite and face it together, standing side by side, shoulder to shoulder. We are not at peace, so we can not afford to fight each other. Europe is under siege and we need to stand together! United we stand, divided we fall. It’s a cliché but it is true.

The only political party we should embrace is our tribes (e. g. the individuals closest to us by family relations, or perhaps simply Europeans living near each other forming new tribes)! The only religion we should embrace is our pre-Christian European religion. The only “nation” we should embrace is our European race/species.

Nationalism is not the opposite of Internationalism! Right-wing extremism is not the opposite of left-wing extremism! Nationalism is to Internationalism and right-wing extremism is to left-wing extremism what Satanism is to Christianity. Get rid of it! Embrace your European heritage instead! Take away their opportunity to divide and conquer! They stand no chance against a united Europe! HailaR WôðanaR!

More beautiful Ukrainians!