|
|
Пишет hwobr (![[info]](http://lj.rossia.org/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} hwobr) |
WSWS
На World Socialist Web Site, по последней ссылке, пишут, что пиратская партия - говно:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/mar20
A glimpse at its Saarland election program demonstrates the real social interests the party represents. While many points are formulated in very general terms, the party explicitly expresses its commitment to the constitutional debt brake which is used by all parties to justify massive cuts in social spending.
The program states: “The goal of a balanced budget without new borrowing has top priority for us in terms of a sustainable, future-oriented economic policy.” These funds, the Pirates argue, should be saved in the administration, which should be organized more efficiently—in other words, via layoffs.
One funding area the party does not want to cut, but rather to enhance: the “material and human resources” for the police. While this defence of the state appears illogical for a party that proclaims it upholds the rights of freedom, it is, in fact, entirely in keeping with the party’s defence of the capitalist economic system and its resulting social inequality. The social misery and anger produced by savings and redundancies must be kept under control by the police.
На World Socialist Web Site, по последней ссылке, пишут, что пиратская партия - говно:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/mar20
A glimpse at its Saarland election program demonstrates the real social interests the party represents. While many points are formulated in very general terms, the party explicitly expresses its commitment to the constitutional debt brake which is used by all parties to justify massive cuts in social spending.
The program states: “The goal of a balanced budget without new borrowing has top priority for us in terms of a sustainable, future-oriented economic policy.” These funds, the Pirates argue, should be saved in the administration, which should be organized more efficiently—in other words, via layoffs.
One funding area the party does not want to cut, but rather to enhance: the “material and human resources” for the police. While this defence of the state appears illogical for a party that proclaims it upholds the rights of freedom, it is, in fact, entirely in keeping with the party’s defence of the capitalist economic system and its resulting social inequality. The social misery and anger produced by savings and redundancies must be kept under control by the police.
Добавить комментарий:
