а самому слабо?
This measure has long been implemented where it is possible to simply attach to its policy will be problematic. And it does not make much sense. As for the destruction of this state - i.e. change of the political course and leadership - I completely agree, but as regards the abolition of the Russian language - this is an exercise meaningless, because there is a "logocracy on the contrary."

In other words, to assume that if you take down the definitions, then the definition also disappears - it is at least naive. Moreover, the inertia of being itself does not need determinants - just about how another traditionalist society does not need science.

Accordingly, to fundamentally abolish the inertia of being, political will is necessary, i.e. a structure that will move the culture (and with it logocracies as a management apparatus) from the main identity to the auxiliary one, where it will no longer represent any danger.
(ц) translate.google.com