Re: На правах шизы

вот, собственно, классическое
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/bob-black-feminism-as-fascism
приличные анархисты почти все эту позицию разделяют
(а остальные не считают, что property is theft)

All hyperbole and metaphor aside, what passes for "radical
feminism" is fascism. It promotes chauvinism, censorship,
maternalism, pseudo-anthropology, scapegoating, mystical
identification with nature, tricked-up pseudo-pagan
religiosity, enforced uniformity of thought and even
appearance (in some quarters, Hera help the ectomorphic or
"feminine" feminist!). Here is all of the theory and too
much of the practice we should all be able to recognize by
now. An ominous tactical continuity with classical
fascism, also, is the complementarity between
private-vigilantist and statist methods of
repression. Thus Open Road, the Rolling Stone of
anarchism, applauded some anti-porn actions in Vancouver
(not as direct action, hence understandable even if
misdirected, but rather) because they encouraged lethargic
prosecutors to persecute. In post-World War I Italy (the
suppression of the IWW in America followed a similar
pattern), fascist gangs attacked socialist and trade-union
organizations with the tacit approval of the police, who
never intervened except against the left. As I once
wonderingly asked: "How come these women won't get in bed
with any man except the DA?"

Radical feminism (no point disputing title to the phrase
with its present owners), then, is a ludicrous,
hate-filled, authoritarian, sexist, dogmatic construct
which revolutionaries accord an unmerited legitimacy by
taking it seriously at all.