|
| |||
|
|
Где это они на такое ссылаются? Такого закона, насколько я понимаю, просто нет, соответственно ссылаться на него нельзя. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of For instance, a U.S. newspaper may freely express opinions which in other places might be criminalized as "hate speech", and organizations dedicated to such speech may freely march and speak in public (after having complied with all relevant content-neutral regulations). For these reasons, the Web services of most neo-nazis organizations, and most Holocaust deniers, etc. are hosted in the United States. Within the U.S., the freedom of speech also varies widely from one state to the next. Of all states, the state of California permits its citizens the broadest possible range of free speech under the state constitution (whose declaration of rights includes a strong affirmative right to free speech in addition to a negative right paralleling the federal prohibition on laws that abridge the freedom of speech). Thanks to the Pruneyard case, California residents are even allowed to engage in free speech on other persons' private property. Иначе говоря, по калифорнийским законам я могу упражняться в hate speech даже на чужой частной собственности, и если они хотят помешать мне в этом, их можно в теории засудить нахуй. Такие дела Миша Добавить комментарий: |
||||