And the Pursuit of Happiness - February 26th, 2007 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Евгений Вассерштром

[ userinfo | ljr userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

February 26th, 2007

[Feb. 26th, 2007|12:10 am]
1. Meaning of happiness seems to depend on individual's estimate of his/her life expectancy. It would be interesting to run a series of thought experiments on "what would happiness be if you were to live 10years; 20yrs; 30yrs;40;60;80;100;150;300;1000?" Check for qualitative changes on the timeline.

2. Happiness: A History by Darrin M. McMahon

3. High divorce rates. Why? If people were "designed by evolution" to live till about 30-40 with imminent danger of death from childbirth (women), violence (men), desease(children), then monogamy seems to be a cultural patch on a biological problem. Serial monogamy.

4. would be interesting to trace evolution of prayer.
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

[Feb. 26th, 2007|12:51 pm]
One reason for the current attractiveness of spirituality is that, because its source in intuition is so radically different from the densely factual, rational nature of science, it generates a feeling that people interpret as a sign of truth and leads to a vitality that reassures those disheartened by a materialism that challenges each person's free will and the anomie of contemporary life. ibid. p. 85
LinkLeave a comment

[Feb. 26th, 2007|12:56 pm]
When a child answers an adult's question the interrogator's first task is to figure out what question the child was answering. ibid. 87
LinkLeave a comment

[Feb. 26th, 2007|01:26 pm]
A preference for one object or event over another is usually a function of the relation between the object and the category to which it is assigned. Stated differently, every human judgement, whether a feeling, person, or event, is colored by what the agent chooses as a comparison.
Optimists have a habit of selecting a desirable category; pessimists choose an undesirable one; realists, who see both sides, are usually ambivalent. ibid. p.93
Traditional Chinese lawdistinguishes between stealing from a close relative an sealing from a stranger because the social relationship between one person and another dictations the propriety of a behavior. Western law, which is indifferent to the relation of the criminal to the victim and is concerned only with the decontextualized act of steaing, fails to honor this distinction. ibid. p94


relates to low quality of solutions/ideas generated during brainstorming session, when people tend to zoom into a specific issue.
LinkLeave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | February 26th, 2007 ]
[ go | Previous Day|Next Day ]