No one seems to notice |
[Apr. 21st, 2015|02:45 pm] |
The "hybrid war" in East Ukraine is a direct consequence of the gun control policy. If a government treat people as cattle then ANY OTHER government could do the same as well. Cattle have no citizenship, they have an owner, and they could be stolen. |
|
|
Comments: |
«а вот если бы у пострадавшего был короткоствол — всё сложилось бы иначе»
should it be not funny it doesn't worth a post. have you any particular objection to the point?
Did Odessits have a Korotkostwol(tm)? Were people from Kharkiv region treated much differently by "Ukrainian government" (also, the supposition that this is a monolithic actor is questionable, but never mind) than those from, say, Luhanśk region? Do you really think that Korotkostwol(tm) in the hands of Mr.Dombass(tm) would have make that much difference?
So, what does gun policy have to do with the situation? That it maybe correlates to how the "government" treats the "people"? Do you think it is a decisive factor?
i will not talk with you unless you fix the subject and cease trying to strawman my point.
I don't have enough knowledge on a history of relationships between Donetsk region and "government", and there is too much uncertainty in terms used to seriously discuss the "main point", also I don't see a need to, because I am not a subject in those relationships, and drawing any generalizations from would be unwise (because in those kind of situations there are just too much variables to apply any one-sentence wisdom based on other events). After all we're a couple of moscalee trying to find out cho tam u hohlov
The only thing here that I found amusing is tying this all to gun control, and there is little to discuss there either
| |