Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет Apocalypse Won ([info]harllatham)
@ 2020-09-19 11:43:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Justice Shithead
Решил почитать про омерзительную восьмерку верховных судей, макнувших в 1975 году Никсона головой в это самое
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Nixon
но пока застрял на Дугласе -- больно уж занимательная личность кек: введен в состав политбюро в возрасте 40 лет по номинации от ФД Рузвельта, рассматривался как кандидат в вице-президенты от демократов, довольно эксцентричный, раздражающий праваков (единственный верховный судья в новейшей истории США, которому дважды пытались устроить импичмент), самый долгослужащий член SCOTUS и "главный либертарианец" в рядах судейских
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_O._Douglas
"Judge Richard A. Posner, who was a law clerk at the Court during the latter part of Douglas's tenure, characterized him as "a bored, distracted, uncollegial, irresponsible" Supreme Court justice, as well as "rude, ice-cold, hot-tempered, ungrateful, foul-mouthed, self-absorbed" and so abusive in "treatment of his staff to the point where his law clerks — whom he described as 'the lowest form of human life' — took to calling him "shithead" behind his back." Posner asserts also that "Douglas's judicial oeuvre is slipshod and slapdash", but yet, Douglas's "intelligence, his energy, his academic and government experience, his flair for writing, the leadership skills that he had displayed at the SEC, and his ability to charm when he bothered to try" could have let him "become the greatest justice in history."

Judicial philosophy
In general, legal scholars have noted that Douglas's judicial style was unusual in that he did not attempt to elaborate justifications for his judicial positions on the basis of text, history, or precedent. Douglas was known for writing short, pithy opinions which relied on philosophical insights, observations about current politics, and literature, as much as more conventional "judicial" sources. Douglas wrote many of his opinions in twenty minutes, often publishing the first draft. Douglas was also known for his fearsome work ethic, publishing over thirty books and once telling an exhausted secretary (Fay Aull) "If you hadn't stopped working, you wouldn't be tired"."
Douglas frequently disagreed with the other justices, dissenting in almost 40% of cases, more than half of the time writing only for himself. Ronald Dworkin would conclude that because Douglas believed his convictions were merely "a matter of his own emotional biases", Douglas would fail to meet "minimal intellectual responsibilities". Ultimately, Douglas believed that a judge's role was "not neutral." "The Constitution is not neutral. It was designed to take the government off the backs of the people... "
On the bench, Douglas became known as a strong advocate of First Amendment rights. With fellow Justice Hugo Black, Douglas argued for a "literalist" interpretation of the First Amendment, insisting that the First Amendment's command that "no law" shall restrict freedom of speech should be interpreted literally.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminiello_v._City_of_Chicago
Дело запрещенного в служении католического священника, толкнувшего зажигательную речь, исполненную антисемитских инвектив, перед собранием "ветеранов-христиан", а на улице против всего этого дерьма протестовали активисты, численно превышающие христианское сборище, и полиция не смогла поддержать порядок на должном уровне, в результате чего священника оштрафовали на сотню баков, но иерей недостойный дотошно прошёл все судебные инстанции вплоть до верховной и таки добился отмены приговора: признали нарушением 1й поправки 5ю голосами против 4х, и Дуглас был в большинстве. "He wrote the opinion in Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949), overturning the conviction of a Catholic priest who allegedly caused a "breach of the peace" by making anti-Semitic comments during a raucous public speech." И не только за фашню вступался, но и за комуняк: "Douglas, joined by Black, furthered his advocacy of a broad reading of First Amendment rights by dissenting from the Supreme Court's decision in Dennis v. United States (1952), affirming the conviction of the leader of the U.S. Communist Party."


(Добавить комментарий)

Please don't emanate in the penumbras
[info]harllatham
2020-09-19 13:00 (ссылка)
Douglas wrote the Opinion of the Court in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), explaining that a constitutional right to privacy forbid state contraception bans because "specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance." This went too far for his old ally Black, who dissented in Griswold. Justice Clarence Thomas would years later hang a sign in his chambers reading "Please don't emanate in the penumbras"

(Ответить)


[info]harllatham
2020-09-19 14:04 (ссылка)
https://www.seattletimes.com/pacific-nw-magazine/supreme-court-justice-william-o-douglas-was-not-just-a-legal-giant-but-also-a-powerful-environmentalist/
In 1958, U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas led a 22-mile hike along the northern Washington coast to protest a proposed extension of Highway 101 that would have intersected the longest stretch of primitive coastline in the Lower 48 states. Douglas argued to the National Park Service that, “[A] highway would destroy much of the unique values that the primitive beach now has.”

(Ответить)

living in a world of confrontations
[info]harllatham
2020-09-19 14:12 (ссылка)
In Schlesinger v. Holtzman (1973) Justice Thurgood Marshall issued an in-chambers opinion declining a Congresswoman's request for a court order stopping the military from bombing Cambodia. The Court was in recess for the summer but the Congresswoman reapplied, this time to Douglas. Douglas met with the Congresswoman's ACLU lawyers at his home in Goose Prairie, Washington and promised them a hearing the next day. On Friday, August 3, 1973, Douglas held a hearing in the Yakima federal courthouse, where he dismissed the Government's argument that he was causing a "constitutional confrontation" by saying, "we live in a world of confrontations. That's what the whole system is about."

(Ответить)


[info]harllatham
2020-09-19 15:27 (ссылка)
Смирение паче гордости: не удалось стать президентом (как мечтал), так назвался рядовым

Throughout his life Douglas claimed he had been a U.S. Army private, which was inscribed on his headstone.

(Ответить) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]harllatham
2020-09-19 15:30 (ссылка)
Но окончилась та перекличка
И пропала, как весть без вестей,
И по выбору совести личной
По указу великих смертей
Я — дичок испугавшийся света
Становлюсь рядовым той страны,
У которой попросят совета
Все, кто жить и воскреснуть должны,
И союза ее гражданином
Становлюсь на призыв и учет,
И вселенной ее семьянином
Всяк живущий меня назовет

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


[info]harllatham
2020-09-19 17:02 (ссылка)
In his dissenting opinion in the landmark environmental law case Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 (1972), Douglas argued that "inanimate objects" should have standing to sue in court:

"Inanimate objects are sometimes parties in litigation. A ship has a legal personality, a fiction found useful for maritime purposes. The corporation sole — a creature of ecclesiastical law — is an acceptable adversary and large fortunes ride on its cases... So it should be as respects valleys, alpine meadows, rivers, lakes, estuaries, beaches, ridges, groves of trees, swampland, or even air that feels the destructive pressures of modern technology and modern life. The river, for example, is the living symbol of all the life it sustains or nourishes — fish, aquatic insects, water ouzels, otter, fisher, deer, elk, bear, and all other animals, including man, who are dependent on it or who enjoy it for its sight, its sound, or its life. The river as plaintiff speaks for the ecological unit of life that is part of it."

(Ответить)