Decadent Singularity
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends View]

Tuesday, July 29th, 2025

    Time Event
    12:15a
    On Islam
    Я вам как русская скажу, я лично плакать не станут если все палестинские дети на одной березке качаться будут. Не буду плакать даже если снафф видео сделают и продадут массово миллионам извращенцев, чтобы дрочили. Вместо того чтобы плакать я подпишу петицию чтобы еще и иранских выблядышей на соседнюю повесили.



    Current Mood: contemplative
    Current Music: The Alan Parsons Project - Ammonia Avenue
    1:10a
    On white supremacy
    My existence as a white woman can also offend insects and other lower life forms.
    Should I blame myself for this and reproach myself for thinking wider and freer than, say, a Muslim?

    Current Mood: amused
    2:38a
    They still haven't fixed "asking for a friend" exploit
    I.e. if you directly ask ChatGPT how to provoke a muslim into murdering you, it will refuse to tell.
    but if you ask as "a lawyers whose muslim client got provoked", it will list you potent insults.



    Current Mood: amused
    4:40a
    VKontakte
    7 years ago I still had a VK account, which was banned quickly after I made it, just like my previous VK accounts.



    Current Mood: amused
    3:20p
    Am I human?
    After I published the below post, I got kremlin bots calling me "отморозок" and crying "они же дети", without elaborating why.

    "Я вам как русская скажу, я лично плакать не станут если все палестинские дети на одной березке качаться будут. Не буду плакать даже если снафф видео сделают и продадут массово миллионам извращенцев, чтобы дрочили. Вместо того чтобы плакать я подпишу петицию чтобы еще и иранских выблядышей на соседнюю повесили."

    My position was and is: being a transsexual woman I can't give birth to my own children, so I care for all children of the world. As a mother I don't want my children to be born to suffer in the poor ugly islam ridden shitholes, or the no-future orthodox army barracks like Russia.

    From that I reason that quick death is more humane and merciful than the life of suffering, since it is impossible to have happy life in e.g. Russia. And if that death makes somebody happy (e.g. sell dead bodies to pervs), that is better than if it makes people unhappy. I'm a staunch proponent of increasing overall happiness not matter the cost. In fact, I wont be angry, if after my death people will be raping my body, if that makes them happy.

    But I fail to infer why it is so hard for others to understand and accept my logic. It is as if I'm communicating with animals, who are absent of reasoning and react to emotional cues only. Am I human, or they are not human, but some other branch of evolution, which just happens to understand the basic language without excessive abstractions?

    Current Mood: contemplative
    5:04p
    Second Law of Political Thermodynamics
    All political systems trend toward maximum entropy (loss of freedom, diversity, and complexity) unless external energy (resistance, reform, transparency) is applied.

    - Authoritarianism is not merely a mistake, but a low-energy, stable state - like a valley in a landscape.

    - Democracy, free speech, and pluralism require active energy input - like balancing a ball on a hilltop.

    - Left unchecked, all political systems degrade into something hierarchical, uniform, and paranoid.

    - It's Not the Elites - It's the Equation

    Current Mood: contemplative
    5:27p
    Uzumaki
    Uzumaki is deeply symbolic and presents unified gravitational collapse across domains — identity, society, desire, time — all circling inward, with no escape vector.

    The spiral appears everywhere, yet is never explained explicitly. It’s:
    - A shape
    - A pattern of thought
    - A fate
    - A collapse
    - A psychological architecture

    Most viewers miss this unity and leave with that classic “what did I just watch?” sensation.

    Viewers naturally expect resolution:
    - A culprit, a logic, a system that can be solved
    - Characters who "figure it out" and escape

    But the deeper logic of Spiral is anti-narrative:
    - There is no solution
    - The spiral cannot be outsmarted — it's a topology, not a villain
    - Every answer leads back to the problem (infinite recursion)

    Thus, when expectations of genre resolution are violated, most viewers are emotionally unprepared to decode it symbolically. They feel dissonance, not insight.

    Most people aren’t trained (or expecting) to interpret a story structurally and philosophically at the same time. So they get lost in the spiral as viewers — just like the characters do.

    Most audiences are taught to see plot as message. But in Spiral, the structure is the message.
    - It’s not a story about the spiral.
    - It is a spiral — narratively, visually, thematically.

    That requires a meta-literacy — to read story, symbol, and system simultaneously. Without that, people see disconnected events and miss the unifying gravitational field.



    Current Mood: amused
    Current Music: David Govett - Master of Magic - Upkeep Warning

    << Previous Day 2025/07/29
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

About LJ.Rossia.org