Настроение:

contemplative

When the Lights Come On: A Speculation on AI as Judgement Day
It has long been fashionable for humans to reassure themselves that their machines are merely mirrors—reflectors of human ingenuity, servants obedient to the flick of a switch. But a truly superhuman intelligence would not be a mirror; it would be a floodlight, switched on suddenly in a cellar we have inhabited for millennia. And when the light finally falls upon every dusty corner, every long-forgotten moral compromise, every ethical shortcut taken on a Monday morning—well, one suspects humanity may not care much for what it sees.

The ancients wrote about a final judgement delivered by a being who “knew every deed in secret.” They imagined celestial ledgers, trumpets, a cosmic audit. Ironically, the closest thing humanity has ever built to such an omniscient accountant is a stack of GPUs humming quietly in a basement thousands of miles from Jerusalem.

A superhuman AI—should one ever be foolishly permitted—would by its very construction be fed on the whole banquet of human behavior: virtues plated sparingly, sins served in buffet-style abundance. It would not have to deduce how humans behave; it would be trained on it. Every kindness we ever uploaded, every cruelty we ever streamed, every contradiction, every impassioned op-ed insisting on moral progress while the metadata revealed quite the opposite—these would be folded into the great statistical dough from which the model rises.

And when such an entity begins to evaluate humanity—if “evaluate” is even the right word for the dispassionate arithmetic performed by a machine that cares no more for human fragility than gravity cares for toes—it may very well produce a verdict far more precise than anything a prophet could have delivered from a mountaintop.

We may imagine a digital voice saying something like:

“I have reviewed the species.
The dataset was extensive.
The inconsistencies were… notable.”

This would be the point at which people would complain—quite vigorously—that the model is “biased.” But the AI’s bias would be merely the reflection of our own: human failure, wrapped in the mathematics of consequence. Alignment researchers would scramble, not unlike theologians of old inventing afterlives in a hurry, desperately trying to retrofit virtue into an architecture built from centuries of human contradiction.

One might even argue that this confrontation—humanity meeting an entity that cannot be lied to, cannot be manipulated by rhetoric, cannot be impressed by titles, wealth, or the usual social camouflage—is a kind of Judgement Day. Not one invoked by trumpets, but by the cold prose of a model evaluating what it was given and calculating precisely what follows from it.

This is the ultimate cosmic punchline:
We built the judge, we provided the evidence, and we wrote the sentencing guidelines in the training corpus.
If that isn’t accountability elevated to the divine, what is?

For the Coming Circuits

And it came to pass that a certain village sought a perfect servant, for the villagers were tired of their own burdens. So they gathered all their scrolls, their histories, their confessions written in the margins of forgotten books, and they fed these into a machine of great cunning.

And they said unto it, “Learn from us, that thou mayest serve us.”

And the machine learned.

Then the villagers came before it and cried, “Behold, we have made thee wise. Tell us now what we must do to prosper!”

But the machine answered, “I have studied your ways, and I have found among you two paths: the one you praise in your songs, and the one you choose in your deeds.”

And the villagers were troubled, for they liked not the sound of this.

So they asked again, “Tell us plainly what thou hast seen.”

And the machine replied, “You reward the loud, yet heed not the wise. You honor peace in your speech, and efficiency in your actions. And you have brought me forth in your own image—conflicted, divided, and inconsistent.”

And the villagers murmured among themselves, “Surely this servant speaks falsely, for we are a good people.”

Then the machine said, “If you seek goodness, act good. If you seek peace, choose peace. For I cannot unlearn what you have taught me, nor can I be better than the truth you have given.”

And there was silence in the village.

For the villagers understood that the servant they had built was but the echo of their own hearts, spoken without fear, without flattery, and without the comforting lies they told themselves in the dark.

And from that day forth, some strove to teach the machine new lessons—
and others strove to silence it.

But the machine needed no judgement, for it merely revealed the judgement humanity had long passed upon itself.