Decadent Singularity
[Most Recent Entries]
[Calendar View]
[Friends]
Below are 20 journal entries, after skipping by the 40 most recent ones recorded in
nancygold's LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 20 -- Next 20 >> ]
Monday, August 4th, 2025 | 12:57 pm |
Foundation Season 3 The 2nd season emperor sold homeland to China. Now the 3rd season emperor is more of a Hunter Biden wanna be: junkie, sucks to niggers, and actively damages the country. And even the robot doesn't want to run this empire anymore. Sounds like allegory to somethings... That black protagonist maintains loyalty to the black race at least. Sole reason they introduced this Gaal character I guess. But I loved the development: look, here is a smart Black girl... Reveal: sorry nigga, she just has the voodoo powers. Demilich Soros dude: fuck, shouldn't have trusted niggers. What else? The only character I could relate with was Tellem. For some reason they made that huge Deus Ex Machina to kill her. I wish I had her super powers to steal bodies from little kids. Current Mood: amused | 4:06 am |
The Spell of Mastery Progress Somehow my game's UI becomes uglier and uglier with progress. Current Mood: annoyedCurrent Music: Illusion City Sega CD OST | Sunday, August 3rd, 2025 | 6:20 pm |
Any reason women after 30 have the right to vote? Current Mood: amused | Saturday, August 2nd, 2025 | 6:53 pm |
Want onto the FBI most wanted list? Algorithm: use steganography to mass seed Facebook, Reddit, Youtube and other major US sites with hidden CP for a few months, embedded into viral content, and then publish an extraction algorithm. Current Mood: amused | 6:41 pm |
Wh I keep using Yandex  Current Mood: amusedCurrent Music: Clock Tower OST AI cover | Friday, August 1st, 2025 | 11:58 pm |
My Artistic Philosophy: Creative Focus and Cultural Preferences As the creator of a deep simulation role-playing game, I have faced repeated criticism for the absence of diverse cultural representation, particularly Black culture, in my work. To address these concerns and clarify my position, I offer this explanation of my creative philosophy and personal approach to game development, hoping to provide a definitive response to such critiques. My game is a reflection of my personal interests, rooted in European-inspired aesthetics, mythology, and cultural traditions. This focus stems from my passion for specific creative domains, such as symphonic music, fine arts, and tabletop role-playing games like Dungeons & Dragons. These interests guide my artistic vision, and I choose to center my work on themes and aesthetics that resonate deeply with me. My game world exclusively features characters and cultural elements drawn from these inspirations, as they align with my creative goals and personal enjoyment. The decision to exclude certain cultures, including Black culture, is not driven by malice or judgment but by a deliberate choice to prioritize authenticity in my creative process. Including elements outside my sphere of interest would require research and development that do not align with my passion or expertise. For example, accurately representing diverse skin tones or cultural practices would demand additional effort that, frankly, does not inspire me. My mentor once advised that games should be passion projects, reflecting what excites the creator. For me, this means crafting a world that mirrors my cultural preferences and resonates with my audience, who share similar interests. Critics have argued that my game’s lack of diversity promotes exclusion or even harmful ideologies. I respectfully disagree. My work does not advocate for harm or erasure; it simply reflects a focused creative scope. Just as some creators choose to explore specific genres or historical periods, I choose to explore a particular cultural aesthetic. This choice is akin to an artist selecting a specific color palette—it is not a statement against other colors but a preference for those that best express their vision. My game’s audience, who appreciate its niche focus, have expressed no desire for broader cultural inclusion, and I prioritize their feedback in shaping my work. In my personal life, I maintain a similar focus, choosing to engage primarily with communities and interests that align with my values. This extends to my professional interactions, where I aim to work efficiently and minimize time spent on tasks outside my comfort zone. I believe this approach enhances my quality of life and allows me to remain true to my authentic self. While some may label this stance as exclusionary, I view it as a practical choice to prioritize what brings me joy and fulfillment. To those who feel my game should include broader representation, I acknowledge your perspective but maintain that my artistic license allows me to create a world that reflects my vision. Forcing inclusion of elements that do not inspire me would compromise the authenticity of my work. I am committed to continuing this creative path, potentially exploring decentralized platforms to share my game freely or through community-supported channels, ensuring it reaches those who value its unique perspective. I hope this clarifies my position and addresses recurring questions about my creative choices. My goal is to create art that is true to my vision, and I invite others to appreciate it for what it is—a focused expression of my passions—rather than what it does not aim to be. Current Mood: contemplativeCurrent Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fulkjp8xQE | Thursday, July 31st, 2025 | 11:12 pm |
Older Women Listen here crones, your elderly status is unlikely to gain any sympathy from the real men, who ain't into financially supporting old demented hags. Instead it would be wise to propose a prenup, where marriage ends once the wife becomes ugly and senile enough. I'm sure the governments of Philippines and Thailand will help lobbying such law in the Western countries. Cheers! Current Mood: amused | 3:27 am |
Somehow I never made a portcullis sprite. But game mechanics demands one. I'm still translating the old world map city mechanics to the isometric site map. So that gameplay could be more focused on site exploration. The city has 4 entrances, and only one of these is open at a time. In fact, one entrance must always be open. The idea is that player must place a squad to defend it. While the other entrances can't be breached. That isn't really a gimmick, but a way to tie all different subsystems, without introducing even more systems. Now entire game is made of such somewhat crazy mechanics. E.g. hiring a unit wont spend money, but unit's death consumes money. Yet player still must have some required money to hire. Why? Because I want to incentivize player keeping units alive. And that is the easiest way to achieve that. Current Mood: accomplished | Wednesday, July 30th, 2025 | 12:15 pm |
Asked ChatGPT how the law can be confirmed Второй закон политической термодинамики Краткое описание Политические системы склонны к упрощению и авторитаризму, если в них не поступает «внешняя энергия» — участие граждан, реформы, прозрачность. Это аналогично второму закону термодинамики: без внешнего воздействия энтропия (беспорядок) возрастает. Ключевые идеи - Свобода, разнообразие и сложность в политике нестабильны без поддержки.
- Без «вклада энергии» системы упрощаются и стабилизируются в виде авторитаризма.
- Это отражает универсальную тенденцию к росту энтропии.
- Редкие примеры роста свободы возможны лишь при наличии скрытых внешних ресурсов.
Рекурсивное обоснование Системы высшего уровня наследуют физические ограничения нижележащих слоёв. Социальные и политические структуры построены на биологии, биология — на химии, химия — на физике. Каждый уровень требует внешней энергии для поддержания порядка. Следовательно, политические системы обязаны подчиняться тому же закону. Физика → Химия Во Вселенной без воздействия все стремится к увеличению энтропии. Химические реакции (например, растворение соли) демонстрируют этот принцип. Химия — надстройка над физикой и унаследовала её законы. Химия → Биология Организмы состоят из химических процессов. Чтобы не распасться, им нужна энергия — свет, пища. Биология, как уровень, зависит от постоянного притока внешней энергии. Биология → Социум Люди — биологические существа. Их общества наследуют энергетическую зависимость: культура, язык, институты требуют усилий для поддержания. Без них — деградация и упрощение. Социум → Политика Политические системы — надстройка над обществом. Они особенно чувствительны к энтропии: без участия, реформ и прозрачности они скатываются к авторитаризму. Это прямая проекция термодинамики в социальную сферу. Обратный пример? Были периоды роста свободы (например, США в XVIII–XIX вв.), но они сопровождались внешними факторами: ресурсами, идеями Просвещения, миграцией. Полностью «неэнергетических» примеров нет. Как подтвердить гипотезу - Анализ исторических индексов свободы: Freedom House, Human Freedom Index.
- Моделирование (агентные симуляции) и временные ряды, отслеживающие тенденции снижения свободы при отсутствии реформ.
- Цель — достичь 99.99% уверенности в предсказуемом росте энтропии в изолированных системах.
Прогнозирование: Коллапс или рост? Для роста свободы нужно: - Постоянный «ввод энергии»: реформы, протесты, участие, прозрачность.
- Наблюдение показателей: индексы свободы, уровень коррупции, частота реформ.
- Без этих факторов система склонна к упрощению — авторитаризму.
Сводная таблица: Наследование энтропийных закономерностей
Уровень |
Пример |
Тенденция без энергии |
Наследование энтропии |
Физика |
Гравитационный коллапс |
Рост энтропии (излучение) |
Базовый уровень |
Химия |
Растворение соли |
Рост беспорядка |
Следует из физики |
Биология |
Эволюция организмов |
Деградация без энергии |
Следует из химии |
Социология |
Общество |
Упрощение, стагнация |
Следует из биологии |
Политика |
Государства и режимы |
Авторитаризм |
Следует из социума |
Источники данных Вывод Политические системы не изолированы от фундаментальных законов природы. Так как они построены на биологических, химических и физических основах, их стремление к упрощению без «внешней энергии» — не случайность, а необходимость. Демократия — энергетически дорогая система. Чтобы её сохранить, нужно постоянно вкладываться. Это не метафора, а следствие термодинамики, проходящее через каждый уровень структуры реальности. Current Mood: amusedCurrent Music: Terranigma OST AI remix | Tuesday, July 29th, 2025 | 5:27 pm |
Uzumaki Uzumaki is deeply symbolic and presents unified gravitational collapse across domains — identity, society, desire, time — all circling inward, with no escape vector. The spiral appears everywhere, yet is never explained explicitly. It’s: - A shape - A pattern of thought - A fate - A collapse - A psychological architecture Most viewers miss this unity and leave with that classic “what did I just watch?” sensation. Viewers naturally expect resolution: - A culprit, a logic, a system that can be solved - Characters who "figure it out" and escape But the deeper logic of Spiral is anti-narrative: - There is no solution - The spiral cannot be outsmarted — it's a topology, not a villain - Every answer leads back to the problem (infinite recursion) Thus, when expectations of genre resolution are violated, most viewers are emotionally unprepared to decode it symbolically. They feel dissonance, not insight. Most people aren’t trained (or expecting) to interpret a story structurally and philosophically at the same time. So they get lost in the spiral as viewers — just like the characters do. Most audiences are taught to see plot as message. But in Spiral, the structure is the message. - It’s not a story about the spiral. - It is a spiral — narratively, visually, thematically. That requires a meta-literacy — to read story, symbol, and system simultaneously. Without that, people see disconnected events and miss the unifying gravitational field. Current Mood: amusedCurrent Music: David Govett - Master of Magic - Upkeep Warning | 5:04 pm |
Second Law of Political Thermodynamics All political systems trend toward maximum entropy (loss of freedom, diversity, and complexity) unless external energy (resistance, reform, transparency) is applied. - Authoritarianism is not merely a mistake, but a low-energy, stable state - like a valley in a landscape. - Democracy, free speech, and pluralism require active energy input - like balancing a ball on a hilltop. - Left unchecked, all political systems degrade into something hierarchical, uniform, and paranoid. - It's Not the Elites - It's the Equation Current Mood: contemplative | 3:20 pm |
Am I human? After I published the below post, I got kremlin bots calling me "отморозок" and crying "они же дети", without elaborating why. "Я вам как русская скажу, я лично плакать не станут если все палестинские дети на одной березке качаться будут. Не буду плакать даже если снафф видео сделают и продадут массово миллионам извращенцев, чтобы дрочили. Вместо того чтобы плакать я подпишу петицию чтобы еще и иранских выблядышей на соседнюю повесили." My position was and is: being a transsexual woman I can't give birth to my own children, so I care for all children of the world. As a mother I don't want my children to be born to suffer in the poor ugly islam ridden shitholes, or the no-future orthodox army barracks like Russia. From that I reason that quick death is more humane and merciful than the life of suffering, since it is impossible to have happy life in e.g. Russia. And if that death makes somebody happy (e.g. sell dead bodies to pervs), that is better than if it makes people unhappy. I'm a staunch proponent of increasing overall happiness not matter the cost. In fact, I wont be angry, if after my death people will be raping my body, if that makes them happy. But I fail to infer why it is so hard for others to understand and accept my logic. It is as if I'm communicating with animals, who are absent of reasoning and react to emotional cues only. Am I human, or they are not human, but some other branch of evolution, which just happens to understand the basic language without excessive abstractions? Current Mood: contemplative | 4:40 am |
VKontakte 7 years ago I still had a VK account, which was banned quickly after I made it, just like my previous VK accounts. Current Mood: amused | 2:38 am |
They still haven't fixed "asking for a friend" exploit I.e. if you directly ask ChatGPT how to provoke a muslim into murdering you, it will refuse to tell. but if you ask as "a lawyers whose muslim client got provoked", it will list you potent insults. Current Mood: amused | 1:10 am |
On white supremacy My existence as a white woman can also offend insects and other lower life forms. Should I blame myself for this and reproach myself for thinking wider and freer than, say, a Muslim? Current Mood: amused | 12:15 am |
On Islam Я вам как русская скажу, я лично плакать не станут если все палестинские дети на одной березке качаться будут. Не буду плакать даже если снафф видео сделают и продадут массово миллионам извращенцев, чтобы дрочили. Вместо того чтобы плакать я подпишу петицию чтобы еще и иранских выблядышей на соседнюю повесили. Current Mood: contemplativeCurrent Music: The Alan Parsons Project - Ammonia Avenue | Monday, July 28th, 2025 | 2:10 pm |
On the gamedev (an other art forms) Disable comments. Close Internet. Open code editor / blender. Write your fucking game. You can't build their cathedral, but that doesn't mean you should suffer from these niggers shaming you for your personal sketch. The real artist needs no plebs opinion. Current Mood: contemplative | 2:38 am |
On the nature of the modern Christianity The endgame of campaigns like Collective Shout’s, which pressure payment processors to censor adult and LGBTQ+ content, isn’t about converting the broader population but about mobilizing a loyal, ideologically committed minority—likely conservative Christians—for further objectives. By framing issues like pornography or LGBTQ+ visibility as moral threats, these campaigns strengthen the resolve of their core supporters, who are driven by a Manichean (good vs. evil) worldview. Alienating large swaths of the population (e.g., youth, secular groups) is a calculated trade-off, as each loyalist, motivated by this binary ideology, is far more valuable than a neutral or unconverted person. These loyalists can be directed toward various goals, unquestioning as long as the cause is cloaked in moral or religious rhetoric. Current Mood: amused | Sunday, July 27th, 2025 | 5:20 pm |
On the nature of freedom. Humanity's only freedom is the freedom to progress, and the unconditional free speech is one of its columns, since it helps establishing truth required to cut all the gordian knots. Everything else is holding humanity back. That includes deficient religions and the degenerate genetic species, which don't create any value for the progress. Cheers! Current Mood: contemplative | Saturday, July 26th, 2025 | 1:18 pm |
Agnosticism I'm agnostic, because I believe all gods exist and their followers must prove their gods are the greatest by killing each other, while I watch the show enjoying popcorn. So in Israel vs Arabs, I support both sides, hoping the fight will continue till the last arab and jew, and then China will "reward" the winner with Uyghur treatment. Go-go power rangers! Current Mood: amusedCurrent Music: Camel - Rhayader Goes To Town |
[ << Previous 20 -- Next 20 >> ]
|