You claimed Kerry is for the overly rich, but only named two subclasses of the rich - entertainers and politicians - both of which, I suspect, mostly do not fall into "overly rich" category. For example, Soros is neither an entertainer nor a politician, so both reasons you give - "spend big $$ on their entertainment or vote for them" do not apply to him.

I hope you do understand that the argument "The rich people like Kerry want to keep those poor people dependent so they could stay in power" can be twisted to show that "Bush-Cheney want poor people such as farm workers and those employed in the military and military-industrial complex to be dependent on the government so they stay in power".

And I hope you do understand the reason that Kerry-Heinz's tax rate is so low is because Mrs.Heinz invests in tax-free bonds; which are tax-free for a reason. The rate on their taxable income is comparable to that of an average American.

(Reply to this) (Parent)