Вы гнойный лжец и хуесос.

Лизать анал у Джимбо - заслуга невелика,
но даже и он ничего подобного не завещал.
И пока в педивикии не завелись гнойные говноеды
вроде говноболеслава с говносыем, это был полезнейший
ресурс. А сейчас английская википедия от месяца к месяцу
делается беднее контентом, а уж ру.вики не светит подняться
из говна никогда. И все из за вас, держиморда, нацист
и говноед.

http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/07/10/unwanted-new-articles-in-wikipedia/

It's incredible to me that the community in Wikipedia has
come to this, that articles so obviously "keep" just
a year ago, are being challenged and locked out. When I
was active back on the mailing lists in 2004, I was a well
known deletionist.

"Wiki isn't paper, but it isn't an attic," I would
say. Selectivity matters for a quality encyclopedia.

But it's a whole different mood in 2007. Today, I'd be
labeled a wild eyed inclusionist. I suspect most veteran
Wikipedians would be labeled a bleeding heart inclusionist
too. How did we raise a new generation of folks who want
to wipe out so much, who would shoot first, and not ask
questions whatsoever?

It's as if there is a Soup Nazi culture now in
Wikipedia. There are throngs of deletion happy users, like
grumpy old gatekeepers, tossing out customers and articles
if they don't comply to some new prickly hard-nosed
standard. It used to be if an article was short, someone
would add to it. If there was spam, someone would remove
it. If facts were questionable, someone would research
it. The beauty of Wikipedia was the human factor -
reasonable people interacting and collaborating, building
off each other's work. It was important to start stuff,
even if it wasn't complete. Assume good faith, neutral
point of view and if it's not right, {{sofixit}}. Things
would grow.

Today, {{sodeleteit}} is the norm. And it's not with a
smile, regret or even a note to the user. It's usually in
insultingly bureaucratic code: "Salt it... A7 and
G11... DRV".

It's like I'm in some netherworld from the movie
Brazil, being asked for my Form 27B(stroke)6.

If anyone knows all the codes on the Deletion Criteria
page, you are a danger to Wikipedia. You are a
menace. Because it used to be that users thought about the
value of an article first. As a thinking individual and
Wikipedian, you were expected to decide based on its
merit, rather than trying to shoehorn it into a deletion
category.

It was never like this before.

Привет