tiphareth: UN Bans "Defamation of Religion"

Настроение:	sick
Музыка:	Guapo - Elixirs
Entry tags:	fascism, islam, politics, religion

UN Bans "Defamation of Religion"
Пиздец неизбежен.
http://www.humanism.org.uk/campaigns/free-speech/international-issues
http://vladtepesblog.com/?p=6637
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0811/S00421.htm
http://www.slate.com/id/2212662/

Комиссия ООН по правам человека
по инициативе Пакистана и при горячем
участии говнорашки и прочих идиотских стран
предложила (а генеральная ассамблея ООН приняла)
резолюцию, запрещающую критику религиозных
взглядов. Странам членам ООН предписывается
принять новые законы, с целью законодательного
запрета "оскорбления Ислама" и других религий.

Трепещите, блоггеры! Скоро вас будут сажать
в тюрьму по новой статье.

Мусли говно, со всей их идиотской "религией".
Ну и прочие религиозные тоже, естественно.
Тупое, скотское, отвратительное и бездарное.

Вот кстати, модный фильм "Фитна".
Качайте, пока не запретили.

Фильм дерьмо, но раз запрещают, значит надо.

Привет

(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)

tiphareth
2009-04-15 20:25 (ссылка)

А вот еще до кучи, поучительное
http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/03/26/the-slow-death-of-freedom-of-expression/
The slow death of freedom of expression

Slowly but inexorably the shutters are coming down on what history will surely recall as one of the high-points of human civilisation: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The first shot was fired by Ayatollah Khomeini shortly after he came to power in the Iranian Revolution of 1979, when he said: ‘When we want to know about human rights we do not go to the UN, we go to the Holy Quran.’ Since then, Islamic states and their allies have been slowly whittling away at the Universal Declaration and its counterpart in international law, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

How has all this come about?

The answer, sadly, is that the majority of member states of the Human Rights Council are united in a single purpose: not the promotion and protection of human rights, but the prevention of the exposure of their own human rights abuses.

The idea that member states had to sign up to the full package of human rights law had been quietly dropped in favour of a pledge to ‘work towards’ universal acceptance, and member states were to be elected not on the basis of their human rights record, but by region. The result is a Council comprising 47 member states, 17 of whom are members of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) who, together with their allies, Russia, China, Cuba and the African Group, make up a permanent 2/3 majority in the Council.
The war of attrition on universal human rights continued in 1990 with the publication of the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam. This document, which the OIC claims is ‘not an alternative but complementary’ to the UDHR, makes no reference to the Universal Declaration but states that the Islamic Sharia ‘shall be the only source of reference’ for the interpretation of the rights set out therein. When, in March 2008, I attempted to challenge this falsehood in the Council by pointing out the incompatibility of the Cairo Declaration with the UDHR, I was silenced on a point of order by the Pakistani delegate who said: ‘it is insulting to our faith to discuss the Sharia in this Council’.

Meanwhile, other doors had been closing. In March 2008, after a vote engineered by the OIC and supported by its allies, the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Freedom of Expression was changed to require him to report on not only violations but on ‘abuses’ of that right; thereby, in the words of the Canadian delegate, ‘turning the mandate on its head’.
The combined effect of these changes has been to ratchet up the level of immunity enjoyed by the Islamic states from investigation and exposure in the Council. If that was their only objective it would be bad enough. But for the past ten years they have also had their sights set on a far bigger prize, the acceptance and adoption by the international community of the Islamic interpretation of human rights. To achieve this they needed to tackle head on freedom of expression. Their chosen method was to introduce a resolution ‘combating defamation of religion’. Their stated objective was to prevent the negative stereotyping of Islam in the media following 9/11 (although their initial presentation of this resolution predated 9/11 by 2-and-a-half years), the linking of Islam with violence and terror, and increasing discrimination against Muslims. The unstated objective was to create a framework for the world-wide introduction of laws to silence any criticism of Islam, its laws or its practices.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	polumrak 2009-04-15 20:30 (ссылка)
	Да, очень поучительно. Только каким бы говном ни была комиссия по правам человека, ваши слова все равно неверны. (Ответить) (Уровень выше)

	polumrak 2009-04-15 20:44 (ссылка)
	Но вот чего я не смог найти, и был бы признателен, если бы мне помогли — имя представителя Роисси в комиссии по правам человека. (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	tiphareth 2009-04-15 21:06 (ссылка)
	Членство в совете по правам человека при ООН коллективное (по странам). Представитель России в ООН вот тут, с говорящей фамилией Чуркин: http://www.un.int/russia/new/MainRoot/churkin.html (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	polumrak 2009-04-15 21:10 (ссылка)
	Chairman of Senior Arctic Officials, Arctic Council. Chairman of Senior Arctic Officials. Протоколы арктических мудрецов. Так что, в соответствии с упомянутым, мы положим правильное: молочное видо — это сисоло потненькое. (Ответить) (Уровень выше)

(Читать комментарии) -