|
|
Пишет Misha Verbitsky (![[info]](http://lj.rossia.org/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} tiphareth) |
Dan Eaton, an employment lawyer, in San Diego wrote on CNBC: “Federal labour law bars even non-union employers like Google from punishing an employee for communicating with fellow employees about improving working conditions … California law prohibits employers from threatening to fire employees to get them to adopt or refrain from adopting a particular political course of action.”
He also said” “It is unlawful for an employer to discipline an employee for challenging conduct that the employee reasonably believed to be discriminatory, even when a court later determines the conduct was not actually prohibited by the discrimination laws.”
A spokesman for Google in London declined to comment to the press on the legality of the decision.
Our guess: the most likely outcome will be a multi-million dollar settlement, and in a few months the name James Damore will be forgotten.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-0
90/100 так и будет
He also said” “It is unlawful for an employer to discipline an employee for challenging conduct that the employee reasonably believed to be discriminatory, even when a court later determines the conduct was not actually prohibited by the discrimination laws.”
A spokesman for Google in London declined to comment to the press on the legality of the decision.
Our guess: the most likely outcome will be a multi-million dollar settlement, and in a few months the name James Damore will be forgotten.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-0
90/100 так и будет
Добавить комментарий:
