Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет Misha Verbitsky ([info]tiphareth)
@ 2021-10-06 20:33:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Настроение: sick
Музыка:ORBITAL - ORBITAL (1991)
Entry tags:books, sjw

Цинические теории
Написал блурб на книжечку, по просьбе издателя
думаю, он не пойдет, потому что слишком пространно,
типа не уложился в формат, но сохраню для памяти

жанр смешной, ни разу не сочинял такого

http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=9A1609370E7965C6B9FAAC9FEE97F343

Начиная с 1990-х, раздел "critical theories"
чудовищно разросся и подмял гуманитарные полки
американских книжных магазинов; если вам нужна
развернутая аннотация к этой книгопродукции,
не стесняйтесь почитать книгу Линдсей-Плакроуз
"Критические Цинические теории".

Линдсей-Плакроуз отвечают на самый
животрепещущий вопрос, возникающий у стороннего
наблюдателя: каким образом "критическая теория",
созданная французскими революционерами 1960-х,
и основанная на отрицании любых догм, любой власти
и любых абсолютов, стала фундаментом нового
политического истеблишмента и превратилась в
догматическое, тотально нетерпимое вероучение,
жестоко преследующее любое отклонение от
ортодоксии, и неотличимое от радикальных
ветвей англо-американского пуританизма,
по типу "плимутских братьев" и "кэмбриджской
платформы". Вам интересно, когда в американских
университетах начнут сжигать ведьм и
чернокнижников? Читайте сюда.



(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)


(Анонимно)
2021-10-08 14:11 (ссылка)
A CALL FOR THE TRUTH
A White Paper On The Viral-AIDS Hypothesis
By Robert Willner
The history of medicine contains a plethora of instances in which physicians have acted tragically under "consensus of opinion" rather than relying on substantial scientific evidence. This practice has its origins in the long-held concept that medicine is an "art" rather than a science. In recent decades, the major advances in technology have allowed us to emerge from the "dark ages" of diagnostic and therapeutic doctrines that were often based on personal prejudice and "medical politics". Unfortunately, we have also fallen victim to fraudulent scientific papers because of the inherent trust we place in our colleagues engaged in arcane areas of medical research. In the early 1980’s, physicians became aware of what appeared to be an emerging epidemic which is now known throughout the world as AIDS. Along with all of my colleagues, I eagerly followed the releases from the "authorities" about the progress of the disease and the involved explanations related to behavior of the new retrovirus which was given the designation HIV. In spite of my relative ignorance about retroviruses, I became suspicious that something was awry when retrovirologists, who had spent twenty years and in excess of twenty billion dollars in research on viruses, became involved in extensive apologetics with reference to HIV. They began to use terms such as "mysterious" and "intelligent" in the ever growing number of additional hypothetical explanations needed in the attempt to clear up the contradictions arising with reference to the original virus -- AIDS HYPOTHESIS. I underscore the word hypothesis to remind my colleagues that the so-called AIDS virus has never been proven scientifically to cause any disease, let along AIDS. Every scientific pronouncement is without laboratory proof and is mere supposition.
Allow me to be presumptive enough to speak on behalf of some of our most respected colleagues in the area of research on AIDS; Dr. Peter Duesberg, Professor Molecular Biology, University of California at Berkeley, the world’s foremost retrovirologist; Dr. Charles A. Thomas, Professor of Microbiology, Harvard; Dr. Kary Mullis, six-time Nobel Candidate, Nobel Laureate, 1993 and discoverer of the Polymer Chain Reaction. These are just a few of the hundreds of prominent scientists who have banded together to form "The Group For The Reevaluation Of The AIDS Hypothesis". I have spent five years in researching as many scientific papers and lay periodicals as possible in order to try to fully understand the enigma of the phenomena called AIDS. Everything I have read and verified has confirmed the suspicions which grew out of the obvious contradictions of the "hypothesis" and the practical experience from treating AIDS victims. AIDS is not an enigma, our medical texts have clearly defined the causes of acquired immune deficiencies for over fifty years. What appeared to be an emerging epidemic amongst homosexuals, occurred as a result of three coincidental phenomena; the advent of the "drug culture" of the sixties, the use of amyl nitrite ("poppers") and the visibility of the "gays" as a group when they "came out of the closet". If we add two other obvious factors, starvation in Africa (long recognized as the major cause of immune deficiency) and the use of AZT, the enigma of AIDS becomes crystal clear. The "mysterious" and the "intelligent" virus suddenly becomes the uneventful, ordinary, inanimate piece of dead tissue that it is.
- Dr. Robert Willner
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/rwcall.htm
= = = = = = = =
Dr. Robert Willner had over 40 years of experience and was an outspoken whistleblower of the AIDS hoax.
In front of a gathering of about 30 alternative-medicine practitioners and several journalists, Willner stuck a needle in the finger of Andres, 27, a Fort Lauderdale student who says he has tested positive for HIV. Then, wincing, the 65-year-old doctor stuck himself.

(Ответить)


(Читать комментарии) -