tankies doing tankie shit.

"No one is denying that many, many people have died under Communist regimes, what we are disputing is that this is a scholarly discourse (it is at best only discussed by genocide scholars, which are a minority within a minority, and have not been published in mainstream political science journals, and even then they mostly limit themselves to Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot, which are the only ones who fit the most commonly accepted definition of mass killing) or consensus, or that MKuCR is an accurate categorization; the truth is that it is OR/SYNTH the same way mass killings under capitalist, Christian, fascist, Muslim (mockup) regimes, yet we do this only for communism because, as summarized here, "victims of communism" (e.g. the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation) is more of a propaganda topic than a scholarly debate (see this, especially the notes with sources) but many users actually believe in the former and merge the two, when that is far from an accurate summary of the topic, hence the heart of the matter of that article's diatribe.

The new lead is a better and more accurate, though by no means perfect, summary and proper introduction of the topic, which should show how it is has been misunderstood, falsified, and a good source of citogenesis for years (Conservapedia and Metapedia's "Mass killings under Communist regimes" — I cannot link the latter, not Encyclopedia Britannica or any other proper encyclopedia that would establish notability as those users want the article to be structured), which is not a good thing at all. The real issue is that some users have been supporting and defending atrocious policy and guideline violations (NPOV, OR/SYNTH, and WEIGHT), not Siebert and I, who have been arguing in good faith; clearly, one of us must be wrong but I am still not convinced it is Siebert and I. You have yet to show they are wrong in their summary of the dispute and article's problems."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes

эти же пидрилы (Paul Siebert, Davide King) отметились и в обмазывании коммунистического режима от ответственности за катыньскую резню, мол это не комми режим а отдельные личности виноваты:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes/Archive_50#Responsibility_for_Katyn_massacre

"Stalinism was intrinsically non-genocidal"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Holodomor/Archive_15

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ANKVD_prisoner_massacres это тоже требует удалить.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AVietnam_War%2FArchive_21 тут не читал, но прозреваю что пытается занижать комми death toll.

образцовые комми-википидроы в вакууме. Зачищают реальность от комми-преступлений. И это не так сложно по всей видимости -- найти академической литературы по теме с левым слантом, потратив больше времени чем окружающие, это тривиальная задача, и бац "These sources are top quality reliable sources, and the information from them would allow us to resolve the dispute"

Они ещё любят записывать всех в фар-райт или конспираси теорист без объяснения. Типа, на баззфиде сказали что фар-райт, значит так, и даже не пытайся спорить. А подробности в статье на вики, что там именно ульраправое, или какие именно заговоры - это писать незачем.