There we go Scott. The immediate defensiveness and reactionary attacks on the “woke left” just because I gave you some constructive criticism about your priorities. Yeah, I get it, you’re too “busy” to write anything about women’s reproductive rights right now. Yeah, sure, you wrote some blog post a few months ago that barely stands up for women’s rights. That’s the bare minimum. My point is simply this: time and again, the social topics you choose to discuss on this blog betray your true priorities. I did you the courtesy of counting them, in fact. And here’s the cold, hard numbers: by my reckoning, you have made THREE TIMES the number of posts about the “rights” of nerdy incels and how sad it is that they can’t get sex, versus posts supporting women’s bodily autonomy and basic reproductive freedoms. Once again, I am simply disgusted that your priority seems to be incels’ right to sex versus women’s basic bodily autonomy, as if these are problems even remotely comparable, even in the same league. You’d rather whine about how “nerdy guys can’t get sex” than advocate for women’s autonomy. That’s how you choose to spend your time on this Earth, and I simply find it shameful. If you want to do better, you should explain how astronomically more important women’s right to abortion is than incels’ non existent “right” to sex, and apologize for spending so much more energy and social capital on nerdbros than women in need. But of course I won’t expect that. The immature whining about “mens’ rights,” together with the token support for the most basic womens’ rights, is a classic characteristic of the alt-right fringe of the “centrist left.”

You completely missed my point Scott. There is in fact a direct connection between 1. Your support for alt-right incel politics that violates women’s autonomy in the name of “helping the sexually disenfranchised,” to quote your own words, and 2. my doubt about how genuine your alleged support for women’s bodily autonomy really is. Explain to me, Scott, why I should believe your devotion to “women’s bodily autonomy” when you have, more or less, said that nerdy incelbros should be given sex slaves by the government.
Before you protest about me putting words in my mouth, let me draw your attention to this remarkable post: https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=3766. Let’s remember the context here. This was shortly after a deranged psycopath ran over a dozen people in Toronto with his truck. Rather than condemning this terrorist, you instead posted a link to an article by Robin Hanson, a despicable alt-right libertaribro, who, more or less, said that to placate such violent young men, the government should enshrine a “right to sex,” which, let’s be real, means to give them a sex slave. Rather than condemning this disgusting argument, you actually entertained it! Rather than telling nerdy guys to stop being stinky and awkward and learn some social skills, you reinforced their prejudices and more or less told them that they have a right to sex, while only giving the minimal token support for women’s autonomy.
Let’s be clear. Nobody has a “right to sex.” Nerdbro incel culture is founded on the idea that they have a right to women’s bodies. By entertaining this disgusting idea, you are entirely undermining your claim to care about reproductive rights. Because why should I believe ypu when you say you support a woman’s right to choose,a woman’s right to control her own body, when you think stinky, awkward, nerdy young guys with no social skills should have a girlfriend mailed to them by the state?
It’s clear that, in fact, you don’t care about women’s bodily autonomy Scott. Because there is a direct and inescapable logical contradiction, between bodily autonomy, and thinking you’re “owed” sex, somehow, just for existing and being a male. To whatever degree you do support abortion, it’s not because you care about women, but because you care about “the enlightenment,” which is just a dogwhistle for white supremacist capitalism. You said it yourself just now

Так, ебать квантового левака Аронсона