http://www.mugu.com/cgi-bin/Upstream/Issues/bell-curve/dorffman.html

Soft Science With a Neoconservative Agenda
Donald D. Dorfman

Political agenda:
[...In the final part of The Bell Curve, titled "Living Together," Herrnstein and Murray propose a solution to the supposed dysgenic downward pressures on our national intelligence caused by the large number of children born to "low-IQ women," and to the recent large-scale Latino immigrations to the United States. They argue that America's current fertility policy "subsidizes births among poor women, who are disproportionately at the low end of the intelligence distribution" (p. 548). They seem to urge eugenic foresight to counteract dysgenic pressure: "We urge generally that these policies, represented by the extensive network of cash and services for low-income women who have babies, be ended" (p. 548). With regard to the supposed dysgenic effects of Latino immigration on national intelligence, their central thought about immigration "is that present policy assumes an indifference to the individual characteristics of immigrants that no society can indefinitely maintain without danger" (p. 549)...]

Who are the authors?:
[... The first author, Richard Herrnstein, was a professor of psychology at Harvard University for 36 years. He died a very short time ago. One would presume that The Bell Curve represents Herrnstein's final summing up of a lifetime of objective scholarly research published in peer-reviewed scientific journals on the genetic basis of IQ. Regrettably, the media seem to be totally unaware of the fact that the deceased Harvard professor never published any scientific research on the genetic basis of IQ and its relation to race, poverty, or social class in peer-reviewed scientific journals in his entire 36-year academic career. Richard Herrnstein's actual area of expertise is the experimental analysis of decision making in pigeons and rats, and he never studied the genetic basis of any behavior in those laboratory animals...]

[The second author of The Bell Curve, Charles Murray, has a doctorate in political science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and is currently a Bradley Fellow with the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative research group in Washington, DC. Murray often publishes his research and theories in The Public Interest (e.g., Murray, 1994), a neoconservative magazine edited by Irving Kristol, also a fellow of the American Enterprise Institute and sometimes considered the founding father of neoconservatism (Atlas, 1995). In an article recently published in The Public Interest, Murray listed the first priority of his political agenda: "And so I want to end welfare" (1994, p. 18). Inasmuch as the media sometimes refer to The Bell Curve as Murray's book, perhaps the book represents Murray's summing up of a body of objective scholarly research that he had published in scientific journals on the genetic basis of IQ and poverty. But like his coauthor Richard Herrnstein, Murray has never conducted or published any research in scientific journals on the genetic basis of IQ and poverty in his entire career.]

And so on

Извиняюсь, но в ваших постах никакой критики Bell Curve по существу или ссылок на таковую не наблюдается совершенно. Обычные вопли по поводу аморальности и переходы на личности...
И кстати, какой идиот стал разделять европеоидов и евреев
на две рассы??
Евреи, то есть семиты, относятся к южноевропейской ветви белой рассы.

И давно арабы стали ветвью "белой расы"?

да всегда и были.
А кто они по-вашему ?
монголоиды ? негры ?

Слущай
а почему бы тебе с оболгуевым не организовать "Ассоциацию Третьесортных Программеров". Могли бы запрос на гуманитарную помощь отправить в Конгресс. Вот, мол пока евреи в Гарвардах работают, мы, несчастные русские патриоты в Калифорнии работаем на нищенские зарплаты, ибо нам не дали образование получить евреи