Верхом на чемоданах - Юридическое (издержки работы) [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Masha

[ userinfo | ljr userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Юридическое (издержки работы) [May. 12th, 2006|02:16 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell A Friend Next Entry
LinkLeave a comment

Comments:
[User Picture]
From:[info]enigmata@lj
Date:May 12th, 2006 - 07:47 am
(Link)
В англо-американском праве долго применялось то же правило:
The presumption of legitimacy holds that a child born during a marriage is the legal issue of both spouses.' This presumption was a fundamental principle of English common law that could be rebutted only by proof of the husband's impotence, sterility, or non-access to the wife.' According to Blackstone, non-access could be proven only "if the husband be out of the Kingdom of England or beyond the four seas for above nine months."' Additionally, Lord Mansfield's exclusionary rule of 1777 held that under the law of England, "the declarations of a father or mother, [could] not be admitted to bastardize the issue born after marriage."
http://www.ancpr.org/why_truth_is_not_a_defense_in_pa.htm
[User Picture]
From:[info]liebelyuba@lj
Date:May 12th, 2006 - 11:25 am

офигенно

(Link)
вот это словосочетание!!! "to bastardize the issue"