| Разборчивость |
[Mar. 4th, 2007|05:08 pm] |
|
|
|
|
| Comments: |
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/80531/2147552741) | | | Re: ladylike / unladylike | (Link) |
|
And what about "gentelmanlike"? Is it still positive, or is it just completely non-existent?
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/145590/2147609443) | | From: | bhp1@lj |
| Date: | March 4th, 2007 - 04:01 pm |
|---|
| | Re: ladylike / unladylike | (Link) |
|
We need a sociolinguist who is keeping statistics over time to be sure -- but for myself, "gentlemanly" is positive but old-fashioned.
![[User Picture]](http://lj.rossia.org/userpic/80531/2147552741) | | | Re: ladylike / unladylike | (Link) |
|
Thanks. I guess "genltelmanlike" must have been refreshed by the overwhelming popularity of some Jane Austen's TV-adaptations... | |