[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]
Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in
nancygold's LiveJournal:
- The NPD Strategy (External Exploitation): The narcissist copes with their fragile inner self by forcing the external world to validate them. They need an audience. They extract "narcissistic supply" (admiration, status, power) from others to keep their grandiosity alive. They are hyper-attached to the social matrix because they need it to function.
- The SzPD Strategy (Internal Withdrawal): The schizoid copes by retreating entirely into their own mind. They perceive interpersonal contact not as a source of validation, but as a threat of engulfment or erasure. They protect their selfhood by severing ties with the social matrix.
| Monday, August 31st, 2026 | |
| 3:45 pm | Sunlight for Vampires: Why Narcissists Die in Unvarnished Clarity Original: https://aermia.com/u/NancySadkov/p/sunl It is a well-documented law of human fragile architecture that the charlatan cannot survive in an environment where execution is measured with mathematical precision and spoken of with unvarnished clarity. For the ego-driven narcissist, whose primary cognitive output is the maintenance of a grand illusion, the most lethal atmosphere imaginable is not one of malice, but one of brutal, unceremonious honesty. Where speech is stripped of artificial social cushions, the narcissist experiences immediate systemic failure. The operational mechanics of the narcissist rely entirely on the inflation of perceived value in total absence of actual delivery. To achieve this, they depend heavily on the friction of social etiquette. In conventional, highly polite institutions, any attempt to evaluate a proposition purely on its logical validity is instantly derailed by procedural hand-wringing. The fraudster does not defend the broken code; they defend their dignity, claiming that to point out the defect without adequate deferential ornament constitutes a violation of decorum. Politeness, thus weaponized, becomes the ultimate defense mechanism for the incompetent. When an environment abandons these performative ceremonies—when a flawed assertion is met simply with "that is complete nonsense" rather than three paragraphs of cushioned validation—the carefully constructed apparatus of the narcissist collapses. Deprived of the ability to tone-police the room, they are forced to confront the actual content of their work. Because the content is empty, panic ensues. The evolution of such unceremonious systems follows a predictable trajectory. Initially, a community bound by direct, unvarnished feedback achieves exceptionally high operational efficiency. The signal-to-noise ratio approaches unity. Technical nonsense is discarded at the boundary, and ideas are judged solely by their structural soundness. However, this purity creates an intense evolutionary pressure on the surrounding ecosystem. As these truth-dense pockets demonstrate superior capability, they attract two distinct species of parasite. The first is the overt narcissist, who attempts to conquer the territory by volume, attempting to bully the regulars under the guise of "free speech." They are usually routed quickly, as a truly unceremonious group has no qualms about calling out a bully's underlying incompetence with the exact same merciless precision. The second, far more dangerous parasite is the bureaucratic reformer. Incapable of surviving the rigorous meritocracy of unvarnished criticism, this cohort initiates a moral campaign. They reframe the absence of sycophancy as a safety hazard. They demand the implementation of codes of conduct, institutionalized politeness, and structured feedback mechanisms. The moment a community accepts the premise that tone outweighs truth, the transformation is complete: the performative narcissists migrate in, the competent engineers migrate out, and the organization degrades into a committee dedicated to the mutual admiration of mediocrity. At a societal scale, the systematic replacement of frank judgment with mandatory fluff yields a culture incapable of basic error correction. When the expression of clear, unsoftened reality is classified as an act of aggression, systemic flaws are allowed to compound indefinitely. Bridges fall, codebases rot, and governance turns into an exercise in high-stakes theater, all because pointing out that the emperor is naked violates the municipal guidelines on civil discourse. In conclusion, the preference of narcissists for highly regulated, polite environments is not a matter of taste; it is a matter of biological necessity. The vampire does not avoid sunlight because it finds the aesthetic distasteful, but because photons disassemble its structure. An environment of radical, unceremonious clarity acts upon the narcissist as a powerful disinfectant. If a community wishes to remain functional, it must preserve its right to call a spade a spade, and nonsense by its proper name—without apology, and without ceremony.  Current Mood:  amusedCurrent Music: https://suno.com/song/9f1da017-44ce-455d-ac77-c1037edbf4e9 |
| Sunday, August 30th, 2026 | |
| 7:03 pm | Martin Luther King Jr. Unveiled https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ih8y4KP Guess Russians will call MLK Jr "based"  Current Mood: amused |
| Thursday, August 27th, 2026 | |
| 5:56 am | Realms of Aermia v0.6 Ok. My schizo game got a new updated release https://nancygold.itch.io/aermia It now has RPGMaker style has scenario editor.   Current Mood: amused |
| Wednesday, August 26th, 2026 | |
| 11:31 pm | "Echoism" - the scientific term for cucks and NPCs Beneath the surface, psychoanalytic theory views SzPD and NPD as two different solutions to the exact same underlying problem: a broken, fragile self. The Shared FoundationBoth disorders stem from a fundamental inability to engage in normal, mutual human attachment. Neither the narcissist nor the schizoid can relate to people as real, separate individuals. Instead, they handle the terror of vulnerability through two opposite strategies: The Paradox: Hidden GrandiosityWhile a person with SzPD appears totally humble or indifferent on the outside, clinicians like Ralph Klein and Nancy McWilliams note that schizoid individuals frequently harbor a secret, internal grandiosity. Because they detach from real-world feedback, their inner fantasy life can become grandiose ("I don't need anyone," "I am above these basic human games," or "I possess a secret, superior understanding of reality"). The difference is that while the narcissist demands the world applaud their superiority, the schizoid keeps their grandiosity completely private so the world can't touch or ruin it. "Schizoid Narcissism"The two disorders overlap enough that psychoanalysis recognizes a hybrid state sometimes called schizoid narcissism. This happens when a narcissist suffers such severe social rejection, burnout, or narcissistic injury that they give up on trying to get validation from real people. They drop out of society, adopt a schizoid lifestyle of isolation, and rely entirely on fantasy to sustain their sense of superiority. SummarySzPD isn't the opposite of NPD; it is its introverted cousin. The true polar opposite of the Narcissist isn't the Schizoid—it is the Echoist (someone who fears taking up space and lives entirely to serve the egos of others) or simply a Healthy, Secure Individual who can engage in mutual, unselfish relationships without needing to control, exploit, or run away from people. Current Mood:  contemplativeCurrent Music: https://suno.com/song/6c4c7fae-4284-4c4b-b94a-47a92065584e |
| Sunday, August 23rd, 2026 | |
| 12:56 am | ZIP FILE!  Current Mood: amused |
| Thursday, August 20th, 2026 | |
| 7:49 am | Turbo Pascal I was never a fan of Delphi, but I did found C# and TypeScript okay - for an LLM to write. Although with LLMs you now just use Rust - it is ugly and awkward to use, but you wont see or use it anyway. TypeScript is perfect for LLMs prototyping, after some time you will prompt to rewrite it in Rust anyway, and then maybe to C99 to make it faster and smaller. I do hope porting Symta into web assembly, but really Codex and Claude still have issue properly writing Symta, compared to Rust, they only reason they can handle Symta at all is because it uses so little tokens, and its reference fits into context. Current Mood:  annoyed |
| Sunday, August 16th, 2026 | |
| 8:00 pm | Not Your Personal Army Original: https://aermia.com/u/NancySadkov/p/n I'm transmedicalist woman. That does not mean you owe me your speech, your compliance, or your participation in my delusion-management. Forcing people—JK Rowling included—to mouth my preferred pronouns is authoritarian garbage. They get to see reality as they see it. Bullying them into line doesn't create dialogue; it just proves the people doing the bullying have nothing left but coercion. When some nonbinary freak starts screeching at strangers to "respect they/them," I feel shame by association and want distance. There's nothing wrong with me for refusing to treat other adults like theater extras who exist to recite my lines. If someone looks at me and still sees a man, that's my failure, not theirs. The people who help me are the ones who criticize, not the ones who build a hugbox and demand I silence the critics. Admit that in public and the same crowd that claims "lived experience" turns on you for the crime of not being a bully. Suddenly I'm the number-one enemy because I won't storm Elon Musk's house, put a gun to his head, and force him to gender his daughter on livestream while apologizing for existing. Fuck that. I no longer belong to the "trans community." Once they started cheering the murder of Charlie Kirk—someone who never laid a hand on me or anyone I know—they replaced whatever residual humanity they had with pure ideological bloodlust. I refuse to celebrate a man's death just because the orthodoxy demands it. Hatred is not love, collectivism is not individualism, and enforced lies are not honesty. If these people can't help me transition and instead demand I become their foot soldier, I have zero reason to speak to them. Disagreement is not violence. I want to hear the other side, not shut it down. I am not responsible for rewriting everyone else's reality or managing their lives. I will not evangelize transitioning. If I push HRT on someone who later kills themselves because it failed, that blood is partly on me. Unsolicited glamorization of this process is reckless and wrong—this is not a fucking rock band. The community demands exactly that evangelical zeal, then pretends collective guilt doesn't attach when the outcomes are catastrophic. I reject the collective. I have my life, my body, my transition. No one else gets a claim on it. The Russians already tried to treat me as disposable cannon fodder for their wars. Watching the trans activist class do the exact same thing—demanding bodies for their ideological crusades, treating individuals as expendable—should not surprise me, yet it still does. Everyone acts like I owe them service. I don't. I feel like an idiot wandering a battlefield of corpses left by people fighting wars that have nothing to do with my personal medical decisions. The whole spectacle is a real-life nightmare. That is the honest assessment.  Current Mood: contemplative |
| 12:58 am | Stand with ICE <3  Current Mood: amused |
| Saturday, August 15th, 2026 | |
| 6:58 pm | A Precise Characterization of Modern Liberalism Original: https://aermia.com/u/NancySadkov/p/a-pr Modern liberalism, in its contemporary manifestation, admits of a precise characterization. It is the condition of exhibiting no fewer than five of the properties enumerated below. The list is neither exhaustive nor ordered by importance; it merely records those traits whose simultaneous occurrence has become, through prolonged and depressing observation, a reliable diagnostic. 1. An unwavering hostility toward the state of Israel, maintained with a fervor inversely proportional to any demonstrable familiarity with the relevant history or geography. 2. A principled rejection of artificial intelligence, advanced with the same rustic logic once employed to denounce the steam engine or the printing press. 3. An unquestioning acceptance of the most catastrophic projections concerning global climate, treated not as provisional scientific models but as revealed doctrine. 4. A quasi-religious devotion to the liturgical practices that attended the recent pandemic, complete with residual mask rituals and moral score-keeping. 5. A dietary regimen of exclusive veganism, pursued at a cost that would sustain several less ideologically refined households. 6. Open celebration of political homicide or the street violence of activist factions, offered as evidence of moral seriousness. 7. Public adoption of non-binary identity, accompanied by chromatic hair modification and the obligatory pronoun liturgy. 8. An upper-middle-class childhood whose material comforts are never acknowledged as the precondition of subsequent radical posturing. 9. Possession of a degree in the humanities, worn as both credential and permanent exemption from empirical accountability. 10. An obsessive preoccupation with the Epstein affair and related networks of predation, selectively applied according to the political utility of the accused. 11. Enthusiastic consumption of keto diets, methamphetamine, or fentanyl—sometimes concurrently. 12. Artistic production whose technical standard remains stubbornly fixed at the level once associated with amateur online galleries. 13. An affirmative stance toward the video game Minecraft, elevated from pastime to cultural totem. 14. Sustained personal animosity directed at Elon Musk. 15. Parallel animosity directed at J. K. Rowling. 16. In the case of adult males, a pronounced and public fixation upon My Little Pony. 17. A documented pattern of initiating contact with minors through digital channels. 18. Sympathetic regard for criminal organizations of the MS-13 or CJNG variety (or, in the European theater, for certain migrant street gangs). 19. A terminally online existence, most characteristically expressed through prolonged residence on Reddit. 20. Hair dyed blue, neon, or some equally artificial hue. 21. A pathologically elevated preoccupation with sexual matters, frequently expressed through transgender lesbian identification or participation in polycules. 22. Devotion to the softer occultisms: astrology, Wicca, tarot, and related spiritual commodities. 23. Expenditure upon overpriced garments sourced from thrift stores or self-consciously retro brands. 24. Public adherence to the doctrine of body positivity, ordinarily in the presence of marked obesity. 25. A persistent reluctance to bathe. 26. Whiteness. The presence of five or more of these attributes is sufficient. Their co-occurrence is, in practice, far more frequent than chance would suggest. One is left to conclude that modern liberalism is less a coherent political philosophy than a syndrome—an agglomeration of aesthetic, dietary, sexual, and epistemic preferences whose only consistent feature is the demand that the rest of society rearrange itself around them.  Current Mood: contemplative |
| Thursday, August 13th, 2026 | |
| 9:37 pm | I'm a transsexual woman. Transsexualism is a medical condition, not a fucking identity parade or a political loyalty test. Demedicalization is a scam pushed by people who treat dysphoria like a fashion accessory. Either fix the body to match the brain as closely as current medicine allows, or stop LARPing and go back to whatever jungle produced this latest round of narcissists. The rest is noise. I am not here to join the chorus. Trantifa and the broader LGBTQIA+blm+palestine+kitchen-sink coalition keep insisting I must hate Elon Musk on command. Yet Musk’s Grok generated useful art for my video game for free, and Claude Code running on his Colossus supercomputer wrote actual code for it—also free. Meanwhile the same leftists who demand my ritual hatred attack the game for using AI-generated content and lecture me that I must pay their preferred artists. So forgive me if I notice the pattern: the people screaming the loudest about solidarity are the ones trying to extract money and obedience, while the man they order me to despise delivered useful tools without a loyalty oath. Maybe I’m being told to hate the wrong targets. My real problem is the agenda-driven transtrenders who dictate how a transsexual is supposed to live. They inform me that medical transition “upholds harmful patriarchal misogynistic stereotypes” and that an OnlyFans page “objectifies women.” These are the same people who treat a beard, a penis, and a Palestinian flag as higher-status gender expression than actual sexed characteristics. I want to look feminine and have female genitals. I do not want to look like a nonbinary anti-AI freak still packing original equipment. That preference makes me the problem in their theology. Medical transition is the only part that matters. Social transition without it is just bearded fetish crossdressing with better PR. Rowling’s critique is not subtle and it is not wrong: a subset of sex-obsessed “transbians” with intact high-testosterone hardware treat women’s spaces as an entitlement while recoiling from the surgery that would make their claim less grotesque. We are told to smile and make room in the showers for the fully loaded package and the attitude that comes with it. Trantifa and its enablers inflict more damage on actual transsexuals than they do on the average cis woman, because they dilute the medical category into meaninglessness and then punish anyone who notices. Rowling and Musk have not harmed me. The people calling themselves my allies have. I have taken more aggressive misgendering and “Nazi” accusations from self-identified trans allies than from right-wingers. At some point the word loses its sting; if everyone who refuses the script is a Nazi, then Nazism has been reduced to a synonym for pattern recognition. I still prefer not to look like their ideal specimen. Johanna Rowling remains a TERF icon worth defending precisely because she refuses to pretend that sex is optional cosplay. Claude Code on Colossus was useful. Grok was useful. Angry leftists hate Musk primarily because he creates wealth, builds things, and refuses to kneel. Even if he privately despised every transsexual on the planet, the tools still work and the example of competence remains. Gratitude is not conditional on ideological purity tests administered by people who produce nothing but demands. On the side issue of AI “theft”: I have shoplifted. The American founding involved taking land and using slave labor. Selective outrage over training data while ignoring historical scale is performance. The rent-seeking left objects loudest because AI undercuts their gatekeeping and their preferred patronage networks. Water-use lectures from people who treat every other industrial process as sacred are not serious arguments; they are moral theater. A transmed is simply someone who ranks medical transition above social performance and treats transsexualism as a medical issue rather than a political identity. Mainstream progressive coalitions hate this position because it breaks the narrative. The same ideological current now works to demedicalize autism and ADHD—your disorder is not the problem, the hierarchy is—so the pattern is consistent. Reality is optional; the agenda is not. I refuse the required hatreds. I will take useful tools from whoever builds them, prefer competence over slogans, and keep the medical frame that actually addresses the condition. The people ordering me to hate Musk and Rowling while policing my transition and my aesthetics have already demonstrated they are not allies. That is not confusion. That is observation.  Current Mood: contemplative |
| 3:03 am | On the Thermodynamic Inevitability of Ideological Borders Original: https://aermia.com/u/NancySadkov/p/on-t It has become fashionable among the intellectually stunted to pretend that human social organization is a matter of noble sentiment rather than applied thermodynamics. This is trivially false. Social structures evolve directly from the underlying physics of the universe, and like any physical system, they are absolutely bound by its laws to the letter. A community is mathematically defined as a localized reduction in entropy. Therefore, to demand a society with completely unconstrained entropy is to demand a system that does not exist; it is the thermodynamic equivalent of asking for a perfectly cohesive cup of tea that boils violently in a vacuum without ever dissipating. Without rigid boundaries to contain the internal state, the social system simply evaporates. It is therefore hardly surprising that the native inhabitants of any ideological system view an external competing community with mere disdain, but reserve their most venomous hatred for the internal border-abolitionist. The competing community is just another bounded system—a known, predictable variable. The individual who calls for the dismantling of ideological borders, however, acts as an entropy bomb. They are not offering the community enlightenment; they are threatening the community with thermal death. To the low-entropy structure of a political tribe, the individual demands for nuance and borderless existence is a literal existential threat to their structural integrity, and they react with violence because they have no other physical choice if they wish to remain cohesive. Since these social layers are governed entirely by the cold, unfeeling laws of physics, the concept of inherent universal morality is a mathematically illiterate fiction. Physics possesses no moral vector. Morality is strictly relativistic, an emergent byproduct of the local algorithms a specific community uses to maintain its low-entropy state against the environment. Consequently, any community is exactly as mathematically "moral" as any other. If we were to observe an alien civilization—which, to survive the inevitable statistical certainty of cosmic catastrophes, must be distributed across multiple distinct communities rather than a single fragile monoculture—we would find them operating under entirely alien, yet equally valid, moral frameworks. Their morals, like ours, would merely be the local operating system required to keep their specific tribal boundaries intact. We are forced to conclude that human civilization must be understood as a permanently fragmented set of communities that can never be fully merged. Attempting to force a universal, borderless merge is not a utopian triumph; it is a forced thermalization that would dilute the structural integrity of the human species to the point of extinction. The human organism intuitively grasps this thermodynamic reality, which is precisely why globalists and universal conquerors—the Napoleons and Hitlers—are correctly perceived not merely as political enemies, but as biological extinction risks. They attempt to impose a single, frictionless, boundary-less state on a planetary system that physically requires borders to survive at all. When an ideological subsystem undergoes schism, it does not introduce an unconstrained entropy vector; it merely executes a predictable phase separation. The state’s hysterical violence against the dissenter is usually not a defense against thermal death, but a desperate, low-efficiency attempt to prevent the sudden loss of its internal mass fraction to a newly coalescing, competing low-entropy sink. Communities exist because open, driven systems far from equilibrium spontaneously form and maintain ordered dissipative structures that more efficiently process energy, matter, and information flows. They will keep existing (in evolving forms) for as long as relevant free-energy gradients and selective pressures persist—on human and planetary timescales, essentially indefinitely relative to us; only cosmic heat death ends them completely.  Current Mood: contemplative |
| 12:15 am | "You're not real woman, because you don't respect nonbinary freaks" lol I'm not a real TS, because I believe women should be feminine, and that is sexist alt-right trolling and "hurts nonbinary". Guess I'm a nazi, and there is nothing wrong with being a nazi I don't want to look like a nonbinary freak with a palestinian flag and a penis. |
| Wednesday, August 12th, 2026 | |
| 2:21 pm | Also triggered some leftist transtrenders https://www.reddit.com/r/aiwars/comment Never seen lefties that angry before. AI is the gift which keeps giving. Don't stop, Xi! Hope US government already prepared nice concentration camps for them. It is now just a matter of China setting this dry forest on fire, so US gov will have no choice. Would be such an amazing ideological collapse of the democracy illusion.   Current Mood: amused |
| 6:02 am | Reddit PR Hurray! I got some PR on reddit - people now cite my innovative free art use strategy: https://www.reddit.com/r/RPGMaker/comme Current Mood:  accomplished |
| Tuesday, August 11th, 2026 | |
| 9:59 pm | On the Arithmetic of Dead Horses and Technological Dominion Original: https://aermia.com/u/NancySadkov/p/on-t  It has recently come to my attention that the administrative mind of Western Europe has achieved a remarkable new state of intellectual equilibrium. This state is characterized by an unflinching belief in the magical properties of legal drafts and public subsidies, coupled with a total, pristine ignorance of computational mechanics and industrial reality. The central dogma of the European administrative class regarding capital is as straightforward as it is delusional. Capital is treated not as a measure of productive capacity, dynamic risk, or operational velocity, but as a species of sacred fuel. To the bureaucrat, capital is an abstract numerical quantity that, when poured into a sufficiently large trough marked "Innovation Strategy," automatically yields the desired social and technological outcomes. The mental model operates on a breathtakingly naive assumption: Directive + Trillion-Euro Fund => Technological Supremacy In this whimsical worldview, state-allocated capital behaves like an obedient servant. The European leadership imagines that by drafting thousands of pages of precautionary directives, establishing audit boards, and earmarking vast sums of public debt, they have successfully commissioned the construction of an artificial intelligence base. They believe that when an aggressive foreign adversary presents a tangible hardware threat, the European Union need only point to its pristine balance sheet and regulatory compliance certificates to command the physical universe into submission. The actual mechanics of the real world, however, are governed by operational feedback loops, not parliamentary votes. In reality, capital is merely a signaling mechanism—a fluid medium through which real-world resources, engineering talent, and industrial infrastructure are dynamicized. When capital is injected into a system that has been systematically sterilized by compliance overhead, high energy costs, and an explicit hostility toward commercial scale, its purchasing power degrades rapidly toward zero. In the case of artificial intelligence, modern systems are a direct, emergent byproduct of the massive, unconstrained civilian consumer market. Generative models and autonomous software do not exist because a committee decreed them; they exist because hundreds of millions of people carry devices that generate vast training corpora, and because commercial markets finance the exponential hardware scale required to process that data. When the European state over-regulates this civilian substrate, it kills the organic engine of innovation. It then attempts to compensate by throwing public funds at state-approved defense contractors, academic consortiums, and bureaucratic "tech hubs." This brings us to the fundamental physics of the situation, which can be stated with elementary clarity: you cannot feed a dead horse to make it move your cargo. A dead horse remains immobile regardless of the monetary value of the oats piled beside its carcass. Doubling the budget does not restore neuromuscular function. It merely results in a more expensive pile of rotting tissue and a very costly, highly audited stable. A state-managed defense fund cannot conjure native semiconductor foundries, low-cost precision manufacturing, or millions of hours of real-world edge-deployment data out of thin air. When an adversary leveraging a high-volume, unconstrained commercial industrial base deploys millions of cheap, AI-driven attrition systems, a continent choked by its own rulebook will find that its trillion-euro balance sheet cannot intercept a single hardware payload. The European leadership has not built a fortress of ethical technology. They have merely constructed an elaborate, extraordinarily expensive administrative apparatus designed to manage their own technological irrelevance, right up to the moment the physical universe forces a reality check upon them. Current Mood: contemplative |
| 4:48 pm | Bring Back the Draft! Usually I strongly oppose the draft, but America really needs some foot on the ground around the world, instead of incarcerating people for drug crimes, send all these convicts to military bases across the world to help keeping dictatorships in check and participate in building infrastructure for locals. Let the SJWs actually do something to improve societies in these countries.  Current Mood: amused |
| Monday, August 10th, 2026 | |
| 10:29 pm | United by love, united for love!  Current Mood: amused |
| 9:19 pm | Yasser Arafat was pro-AI and supported trans rights!  Current Mood: amused |
| 2:24 am | Make Palestine Great Again!  Current Mood: cheerful |
| Saturday, August 8th, 2026 | |
| 9:08 pm | The Sacred Crybaby License and the Great Artist Tantrum of Our Time Original: https://aermia.com/u/NancySadkov/p/t Once upon a time in the magical kingdom of Indie Art, a noble creator would sprinkle their free CC-BY assets across the internet like a benevolent fairy godmother. “Here, peasants!” they declared. “Take my free sample, attribute me, and if you like the taste, buy the full feast!” This was the unspoken social contract, a sacred handshake between generous spirit and grateful consumer. Then the machines arrived. Suddenly those same free samples got fed into an AI that spat out a complete sprite pack in the artist’s own style, rendering the paid product about as necessary as a horse-drawn carriage in 2026. Cue the righteous fury. The artist who literally signed a legally binding document granting the entire planet an irrevocable, royalty-free right to copy, modify, and commercially exploit the work now threatens to “DMCA you to hell.” The same hand that clicked “CC-BY” is now shaking a fist and screaming about emotional ownership and “my style.” Let’s be crystal clear: under the actual law they voluntarily accepted, they are wrong. Dead wrong. A proper attribution satisfies the license. Their DMCA is a false claim. Their moral outrage is the equivalent of selling your car, then showing up at the buyer’s house demanding it back because they drove it somewhere you didn’t emotionally approve of. But no, the real crime is that the free teaser worked too well. The “sample” did exactly what open licenses are designed to do—spread, get remixed, get used—and the artist is shocked that an automated tool treated the freebie as free. Their intended social contract was never “do whatever the license says.” It was “use my free stuff only in the exact way that still funnels money into my Patreon.” When the universe fails to honor that secret clause, the only remaining weapons are social media pile-ons, platform-abusing takedown notices, and the eternal cry of the betrayed creator: “But I didn’t mean for you to actually use the rights I gave you!” This is why CC-BY assets have become radioactive landmines. You can follow the license to the letter and still get nuked by a bad-faith DMCA from someone who never read their own terms. The indie community will circle the wagons around the artist’s feelings while treating the person who obeyed the written contract like a cartoon villain. And the root cause remains the same: artists who want the prestige of “open” without the consequences keep picking the wrong license, then act betrayed when the legal document they signed does what legal documents do. In the end, the open license becomes a trap of pure hypocrisy. Artists feel robbed by the very generosity they advertised, and anyone who actually exercises the permissions they were explicitly given gets treated like a thief. The real lesson? If you don’t want people to use your free stuff for free, stop labeling it free. Put “All Rights Reserved” on the sample and sell the rest. Or keep the CC-BY and accept that “free for any purpose” means free for any purpose—including the purpose of making your paid pack obsolete. Anything else is just performance art for the terminally entitled.  Current Mood: amused |
