Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет jalynski ([info]jalynski)
@ 2009-12-26 09:15:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Размышляя над классической формулой Пальмиры...
"Капитализм под руководством сволочей хуже и безжалостнее, чем социализм под руководством тех же сволочей"

Вот проблема: как средство обустроить "сволочей" социализм себя оправдал, т.е. была гарантирована приемлемая в некотором смысле нижняя грань общественного устройства. А как средство  раскрепощения всех прочих, как условие лавинообразного высвобождения творческой энергии человеков-несволочей, - пожалуй, нет...


(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)


[info]jalynski@lj
2010-01-03 03:43 (ссылка)
ОК... But still, as soon as the problem of Russia is the rule of scoundrels and the obvious situation of emergency, the historical chance is left shift. The left shift as a means of forced general measures in law-enforcement and economy buildup. The anti-BOLSHEVIK introduction of liberalism was BOLSHEVIK in its nature with "negative" sign. The cure should be similar.
And... Stalin was the person under whom Hitler was defeated and Russia was modernized. The personal cruelty of Stalin is doubtful the further - the more. And - it was condemned by the CPSU 20th Congress. How many times and how long we should duplicate the SPSU decisions, be the Communist tailings?
And I'm not sure that mechanical "work for youself - unlimited" can dramatically contribute to the society. The same doubt had Jesus Christ as he preached to love and treat another as youself. If Christianity is the European ideal, then only Socialism fits it. Christian morality is a collective harmony within Socialism and it is a merely means to COUNTER greed and individualism under capitalism.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2010-01-03 06:13 (ссылка)
Your thinking is very clever and very brilliant, but please remember that so high level of personal value as yours is not a standard – only few percent of population want to see more than the tip of his own nose. That is why the economy model should base on the benefits for the smallest social unit. All of us should work for the society – not only those ,who understand what for.

The problem, you’ve touched is the quality of personal psyche interior. In general only some of us can THINK (!!). Those will have the additional motivation (or maybe the principal one) knowing that his work is mainly for the society and country development. Those can also organize the social help or be a leader of any other noble actions. Those can be the main force of the development. But why does the existing system force them to work instead and for those who - being in good health - prefer the laziness, alcoholism, debauchery or thievery ?

Our personal opinions about any controversial subject and person as Soviet success in Great Patriotic War, Stalin and many others are always subject to the availability of information, the authenticity of this information, the diversity of sources of information, skills of synthesis and rejection of extremes. Unfortunately the historical FACTS are still not the same for all. That is why Stalin may still be viewed by different persons as a cruel murderer or as a great savior of the country.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]jalynski@lj
2010-01-03 09:23 (ссылка)
the Holy Gospel teaches: He who doesn't work - doesn't eat. The BOLSHEVIKS tried to bring the principle into life by anti-parasitism laws and a system of GULag... "Arbeit macht frei"... It's a scandal, but it's true even in America.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Читать комментарии) -