>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42226250

Как тут объясняют, этого Tomazos перданули за несогласие с линией партии в комитете(всё как коммуняки любят), используя в качестве предлога то, что его заголовок "The xxx question" это якобы 4chanовский nazi-мем, калька с The Jewish Question. Ещё говорят Tomazos отказался менять заголовок, и только после этого его перданули.

Тут https://izzys.casa/2024/11/on-safe-cxx/ имеется какой-то woke высер, судя по тому что JeanHeyd Meneide "is a friend". tl;dr;

(Reply to this) (Thread)

в woke высере обнаруживается следующее:

'Some people think that formal reasoning has already been solved! In the WG21 ISO C++ October 2024 mailing, Andrew Tomazos submitted P3403, a paper titled “The Undefined Behavior Question” (which HOOBOY man we’re just knocking it out of the fucking park with possible anti-semitic dog whistles today aren’t we?), and then when you open this goddamned PDF you realize it’s a fucking cleaned up transcript of a ChatGPT conversation. Because Andrew thinks that ChatGPT has already surpassed human cognition. And he has implied as such on the internal reflector, responding to statements that any ChatGPT submitted work would not be given time he said:

">I really don’t think your suggested policy is functional. At the moment it’s on par with humans, so you might be able to get away with your prejudice for now - but what happens when its work becomes clearly and undeniably superhuman - which seems like something we’ll have to face in about a year at the current rate. Are you really going to try and continue to insist on what will be clearly inferior human design work? I think that would be objectively harmful and an obvious opportunity cost."

Thankfully, not everyone is to quick to believe that ChatGPT as of August 2024 has achieved sentience and is on par with humans (the people who do? Hoagies for brains). Jonathan Wakely of RedHat summed it up in a most eloquent way, stating effectively that if Andrew can’t bother to write his own fucking papers, maybe the committee shouldn’t be bothered to read them (do note that Wakely did not use the fuck word. He’s far too nice to stir up trouble).

Andrew is certainly interesting. He is quite honestly one of, if not the most vocal voice on adding any safety features to C++. In November of 2022, he stated:

">And as for Rust: I haven’t written anything production in Rust, almost noone has - but the feedback I’ve heard so far from people that have actually tried is that working with the borrow checker is a complete nightmare and totally restrictive. I’m sure if I put a straightjacketsic on I couldn’t hurt anyone but I also sure as hell couldn’t play tennis anymore."'

Т.е. чел явно какой-то неадекват. Впрочем автор woke высера тоже ебанутый.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

да и ты ебанутый

(Reply to this) (Parent)