tiphareth
2024-12-01 03:59 (ссылка)
в том, что умный человек не будет здесь писать из-под анона
раз анон, значит говно и нахуй

вот вербяшка сам и пишет все время из-под анона

tiphareth
2024-12-02 05:39 (ссылка)
анон это говно
обращать внимание на говно - себя не уважать
нет, не читает

Never waste a minute thinking about people you don't like.

Dwight D. Eisenhower


Never waste a minute thinking about people you don't like
Time is a precious commodity that we all have in limited supply. Every minute that passes is a minute that we can never get back. Therefore, it is important to use our time wisely and not waste it on things that do not bring us joy or benefit. One of the biggest time-wasters is thinking about people we don't like.

When we spend our time thinking about people we don't like, we are essentially giving them power over us. We are allowing their negative energy to invade our thoughts and emotions, which can have a detrimental impact on our mental and emotional well-being. Instead of focusing on the things that bring us happiness and fulfillment, we are wasting our time and energy on negativity.

Furthermore, thinking about people we don't like can also lead to unnecessary stress and anxiety. It can cause us to dwell on past grievances or conflicts, which can prevent us from moving forward and living in the present moment. This can have a negative impact on our overall mental health and well-being.


https://www.azquotes.com/quote/348845
https://www.picturequotes.com/never-waste-a-minute-thinking-about-people-you-dont-like-quote-10236

The text contains several logical fallacies:

* **Sweeping Generalization:** The statement "All people are chaotic evil by their nature" is a broad, unsubstantiated generalization. It assumes a universal truth about human nature without providing any evidence or acknowledging any exceptions. This is a classic example of oversimplification and making an unsupported claim about an entire group.

* **Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning:** The argument essentially states that because humans are inherently evil, any good they do is ultimately derived from evil. This argument assumes the conclusion (that good is evil) as part of the premise (humans are inherently evil). It doesn't offer independent evidence to support the claim that all actions are rooted in this inherent evil, it just reasserts it in different words.

* **False Equivalence:** The conclusion "So good is evil" attempts to equate two fundamentally different concepts. It implies that because good is supposedly "built upon" evil, it is therefore the same as evil. This ignores the inherent differences between actions motivated by malevolence and actions motivated by benevolence, compassion, or altruism. "Built upon" doesn't equal identity.

* **Non Sequitur:** The claim that "good is built upon evil, so good is evil," is a *non sequitur*, meaning "it does not follow". Even if one accepts the premise that good actions somehow stem from or are related to evil (which is highly debatable), it does not logically lead to the conclusion that good and evil are the same thing. It's a disconnect in the logical chain.

In essence, the argument is a flawed and unsupported attempt to establish a cynical and nihilistic view of human nature and morality.