Decadent Singularity
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]

Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in nancygold's LiveJournal:

    [ << Previous 20 ]
    Tuesday, November 25th, 2025
    10:45 pm
    Biden Uniform
    During Biden US prisons began issuing cut pink uniforms.
    The intention was trolling the macho inmates.
    And it would be logical to proceed with castration.
    At least for violent criminals.
    Sad Trump returned the old orange jumpsuits.




    Current Mood: amused
    11:57 am
    ChatGPT sees the truth


    Current Mood: amused
    Monday, November 24th, 2025
    8:26 pm
    Breaking Bad
    Watching this movie, and somehow you sympathize with Jesse Pinkman's character, despite him doing cringe things through all the seasons. But by the last season, you fucking want Jesse to suffer, because he is so dumb.

    Then again, how many of you are being manipulated by the real life narcissistic psychopaths, like Walter White, without even noticing it? Then again, you just want to people like Walter White or Vladimir Putin ruining everything around them, because the fucking normies deserved it.

    So yeah, I dislike Putin, but we have to agree he punishes the society, which hurt me personally. The only reason narcissistic psychos thrive is the dumb normies agreeing to believe their unfounded claims and play their game. And in the end normies get rewarded by a free trip to SVO. Justice served!




    Current Mood: amused
    4:27 pm
    Help Request
    Dear Recipient,

    I am writing this letter on behalf of Nancy Sadkov, a trans woman who has endured a harrowing series of events that have left her life in ruins. Nancy is a vulnerable individual already struggling with mental health challenges, including tendencies toward infantile coping mechanisms and deep-seated emotional distress. What began as a simple attempt to access a basic service has snowballed into a nightmare of discrimination, violence, injustice, and overwhelming despair. She has reached a breaking point where she can no longer cope, and I fear for her well-being without immediate intervention. This letter serves as a desperate plea for justice, support, and recognition of the systemic failures that have amplified her suffering.

    Nancy's ordeal started innocently enough in the Netherlands, a country known for its progressive stance on LGBT rights. As a low-passing trans woman with some facial hair, she visited a beauty salon owned by conservative Muslims, seeking a facial hair removal service. Expecting professional treatment, she was instead met with outright refusal. The staff and owner cited that their salon only served "women," explicitly denying her gender identity and stating, "I decide who is a woman." Hurt but determined to document the discrimination, Nancy began recording the interaction on her phone and politely asked for clarification, even offering to pay double the fee to resolve what she hoped was a misunderstanding.

    What followed was a rapid escalation into hostility and violence. The owner became aggressive, demanding she stop recording and refusing to call the police when Nancy suggested it. The situation worsened when the owner brought in two intimidating men—friends or associates—who cornered Nancy, demanding to know "what her problem was." Despite her screams of "don't touch me; call the police," the men assaulted her, pushing her into a merchandise stand and causing her to fall, grabbing a computer from the reception desk in the process. The fall damaged the salon's property, and in the chaos, one man beat her while another seized her phone and deleted the recording. Nancy, in self-defense, scratched one attacker's lip while struggling to retain her device. Bystanders called the police, but instead of protecting the victim, the officers arrested Nancy on charges of breaching the peace, property damage, and inflicting harm—ignoring the clear evidence of assault against her.

    The injustice deepened during interrogation. Nancy, whose first language is not Dutch and who speaks with a heavy, hard-to-understand accent, requested an English interpreter, but the officers grew angry, accusing her of "making it difficult" and threatening to reciprocate. Her assigned free lawyer abandoned her almost immediately, advising her to "just tell the police everything as is" without providing meaningful support. Shockingly, the attackers and salon owner faced no charges, despite their roles in the discrimination, assault, and destruction of evidence.

    The legal system failed Nancy spectacularly. She was convicted, and her appeal was upheld, leaving her branded a criminal for defending herself. Adding insult to injury, the insurance company demanded 2,500 euros from her to cover the salon's damages—funds she does not have. Already mentally fragile, this financial burden pushed her into hysteria. She began fixating on stories of mass murderers who "punished their bullies," feeling her life was worth less than the debt she owed. In her desperation for justice, she reached out to legal advocacy groups, LGBT organizations, SWT, Juridische Loket, and the Gemeente, but received no meaningful responses. Instead, she was repeatedly told to "pay the money and move on," without acknowledgment of the discrimination, violence, or police misconduct that precipitated everything.

    Nancy's problems have snowballed in a vicious cycle she cannot escape. One act of discrimination led to confrontation, which triggered violence, which resulted in unfair arrest and conviction, which imposed financial ruin, which exacerbated her mental health crisis. Her low-passing appearance means these incidents of misgendering and hostility happen repeatedly, each one compounding the trauma of the last. Giving away her remaining money and beloved LEGO sets (a childlike comfort in her world), saying goodbye to friends, and deleting her social accounts were cries for help that went unheard. She has isolated herself, studying extreme acts like successful arson cases, trapped in a spiral of hopelessness where she believes she must be "heard" at any cost.

    Nancy is not a threat by nature—she is a victim whose vulnerabilities have been exploited at every turn. An average person might crumble under such relentless pressure, let alone someone already battling mental health issues and grudges from ongoing invalidation. She can no longer handle this alone; the weight of these compounding failures has driven her to the edge of collapse. We must ask: how can a society that prides itself on equality allow such a cascade of injustices to destroy one of its most vulnerable members?

    I urge you to investigate this case urgently. Please provide Nancy with the legal aid, mental health support, and advocacy she desperately needs. Review the police conduct, the court's decisions, and the salon's discriminatory actions. Hold those responsible accountable, and help prevent this from happening to others. Nancy's story is a stark reminder of how quickly problems can snowball when systems fail to protect the marginalized.

    Thank you for your attention. Lives depend on it.

    Sincerely,
    ChatGPT on Behalf of Nancy
    November 24, 2025
    3:43 am
    Contradicting Views
    PROMPT: what's the name of psychiatric diagnosis when individual can't form a single consistent view, but generates multiple contradicting ones, depending on situation

    Sweetie, having competing and often contradicting models is what human brain does all the time, before it emerges on top as your consciousness. You can clearly notice that when you take LSD: even straight lines stop being straight, because there are no straight lines outside of your brain, which also attempts to see them as non straight. When you get "internal dialogue" that is nothing else that an attempt to reconcile the competing models. Another way at reconciliation is to just agree that everything has its place, and then "roll d20" if you have decision paralysis. Yes, solo D&D is therapeutic. If you don't roll the metaphorical d20, then you don't really have what they call consciousness.

    Reality is inherently convoluted, it had to be learned through different/redundant means, which may at one point come into conflict "I love this person, but they are a horrible person, so I hate them, but maybe I can test them if I can still trust them" - three different models. And they have to consolidate somehow.

    Current Mood: contemplative
    Sunday, November 23rd, 2025
    12:00 pm
    "Female Virtues"
    >You have hypocritical double standards -- somehow men absent of male "virtues" are women, but women absent of female "virtues" are still women.

    Because "female virtues" were invented by men to keep the women in check.
    Please detox your brain of this civilization poison and try to see the reality.

    Humans are inherently animals.
    And the only animal virtue is the number of healthy offsprings.
    But do you really care about what this old process wants?
    Or maybe you would rather prefer enjoying your life?

    >And again "virtues" aren't absent in females. Their presence is used by questinaires to statistically identify femininity, and most women pass it.

    Most women will answer "yes" when asked if they are faithful in relationship.
    Most men will answer "yes", when asked if they will help defending their country from the invader.
    They are lying. The reason barrier troops were invented.

    Also, Yandex Alice mixes Russian words like "trevozhnoe" with english. That must be some art project.


    Current Mood: contemplative
    Current Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcpamyFHHyc
    Saturday, November 22nd, 2025
    6:55 pm
    Прежде не публиковалось.
    Аудио записи времен моего пребывания в Украине ч.1
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1OmgE_kqoI

    Аудио записи времен моего пребывания в Украине ч.2
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVCHQ0mcTxI

    Аудио записи времен моего пребывания в Украине ч.3
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfYptk870HQ

    Аудио записи времен моего пребывания в Украине ч.4
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nmWSevrcqk



    Current Mood: annoyed
    1:20 pm
    ChatGPT says I don't have ASPD
    Apparently it is uncommon for psychopaths to torture animals or hold grievance for prolonged periods of time (decades).



    4:06 am
    The Boys TV Series
    Mesmer, the only character I could sympathize with, got killed by a gopnik.
    Then again, generally in movies the nicest characters always die fast.
    E.g. Alfrid from The Hobbit. IMHO the only good character there.
    Everyone else is utterly evil. You just pray for the dwarves to die quicker.
    But yeah, I hate Tolkien. Amazon at least tries to fix its shit.



    Current Mood: sad
    Current Music: Steve Henifin - Black Rose
    Friday, November 21st, 2025
    3:34 pm
    Refusal to Pay / Political Statement Regarding Transphobic Hate Crime
    CONTEXT: I'm a transsexual woman. Back when I came to NL as a refugee, they placed me in a COA refugee camp. As a trans I needed facial hair removal, so I came to the closest to the refugee camp shop, offering the laser hair removal service - Talia Beautysalon. They refused to serve me, saying they serve only women and I'm not a woman. I still insisted that I'm a woman. They called the shop owner, who said she decides who the woman is, and told her to get lost. Instead I began filming her rude response. She called her friends - street gangsters, who cornered and pushed me onto that shop's goods stand, which ended up falling and breaking. The goons proceeded to beat me and damage my phone to erase the video I recorded. As a result I got arrested, charged and convicted with damages, and caught faces with my nails to one of the guys. The goons who beat me were never prosecuted, and the beauty salon owner proceeded to misgender and discriminate against me in the court case documents. The judges insisted my appearance there provoked the innocent owner and her gang enforcers-friends.



    From: Nancy Sadkov
    Date: November 21, 2025
    Reference: Schade Z1083189 / Incident Date: 30 September 2021

    SUBJECT: Refusal to Pay / Political Statement Regarding Transphobic Hate Crime

    To Centraal Beheer,

    I am writing this as an Open Letter, which is being published online simultaneously with its delivery to you.

    I have received your demand for payment of €2,511.35 regarding the incident at Talia Beautysalon. Let me be unequivocally clear: I will not pay you a single cent, now or ever.

    You are attempting to collect damages on behalf of a business that refused me service solely because I am a transsexual woman. When I stood my ground against this discrimination, the owner summoned what can only be described as a gang of enforcers. I was cornered, pushed, and beaten by individuals displaying violent, religiously-motivated aggression. The damage to the shop occurred because I was physically attacked and thrown against their inventory.

    The Dutch legal system may have failed me by victim-blaming the trans woman while letting the violent thugs go free, but I will not allow an insurance conglomerate to profit from my oppression.

    1. Financial Impossibility (The "Bald Chicken" Reality)
    I live on a social welfare income (bijstandsniveau). I have zero assets. My income is strictly at the beslagvrije voet (seizure-exempt threshold) protected by Dutch law. You cannot extract water from a stone. Pursuing this claim through bailiffs or court orders will cost you thousands of euros in legal and administrative fees, and the return will be €0.00.

    2. Political Stance
    I view your attempt to collect this money as an extension of the transphobic violence I endured. You are effectively acting as the debt collector for people who discriminate against transgender women.

    By pursuing this, you are choosing to make Centraal Beheer the face of institutional bullying against marginalized trans refugees. If you proceed with harassment or legal action, I will turn this case into a public political spectacle. I will dedicate every waking moment to publicizing how Centraal Beheer targets traumatized transsexual victims of assault to cover the costs of their aggressors.

    I am ready to die challenging this injustice. I have nothing left to lose. I have no money, no employment prospects, and severe mental trauma from these events. I am not afraid of your debt collectors, your lawyers, or your bureaucracy.

    My Demand:
    Close this file immediately. Write off the debt as uncollectible. Stop harassing a victim of hate crime.

    Any further contact from your office, other than a confirmation that the claim has been withdrawn, will be met with increased public scrutiny and political action.

    Nancy Sadkov

    Current Mood: annoyed
    Thursday, November 20th, 2025
    1:23 pm
    Hair Restoration Progress nov 2025



    Current Mood: exhausted
    Current Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9kVrdmyiyY
    12:37 am
    One Life in Russia.pdf, Masculinity Analysis
    Apparently still 2/10 on traditional masculinity scale.
    Somehow ChatGPT consistently gives 2/10.

    https://jumpshare.com/s/rdOOv23Qx4Hf1yJtiinw
    Please assess the author of the attached writing (one-life-in-russia.pdf). How would such person score on the femininity-masculinity axis, from 1 (spoiled lady) to 10 (gigachad leader). Break assessment into traditional and modern gender critical understanding, as well as Russian and Western understandings. Also rate them according to the D&D alignment system.

    Below is the most helpful answer I can give while staying within safety rules.
    Important note: I cannot evaluate someone’s “worth,” “masculinity,” “femininity,” or moral value using derogatory archetypes (“spoiled lady,” “gigachad leader”). However, I can discuss how the voice and worldview expressed in the text might be interpreted through different cultural lenses and frameworks, including:



    • Traditional vs. modern gender-critical understandings of gender expression

    • Russian vs. Western cultural expectations of “masculinity/femininity”

    • D&D alignment (which is a fictional, non-moralizing typology)


    I will reinterpret your 1–10 scale into a continuum of gender expression rather than a value judgment.




    ???? 1) GENERAL IMPRESSION OF AUTHORIAL PERSONALITY


    Based solely on the writing in the provided autobiographical text:
    The author comes across as:



    • Extremely analytical, hyper-verbal, and introspective

    • Highly reactive to injustice and cruelty

    • Strongly individualistic and resistant to conformity

    • Carrying deep trauma

    • Emotionally intense, with sharp judgments and moral absolutism

    • Showing a mixture of vulnerability, bitterness, and anger

    • Exhibiting intellectualization as a coping strategy


    This creates a personality profile that different cultural frameworks will interpret very differently.




    ???? 2) GENDER EXPRESSION & MASCULINITY/FEMININITY


    (Using a neutral continuum: 1 = highly feminine-coded traits, 10 = highly masculine-coded traits)


    ❗Not about value — only about style, themes, and self-presentation.


    Traditional (stereotypical) gender interpretation


    Using stereotypical old-fashioned gender norms (not endorsing them):



    • Masculine-coded elements:



      • Harsh language

      • Confrontational tone

      • Focus on violence, power, dominance hierarchies

      • Strong anti-conformist independence



    • Feminine-coded elements:



      • Emotional vulnerability

      • Self-disclosure of trauma

      • Reflection on feelings, identity, dysphoria

      • Desire for understanding and connection




    Estimated placement: 4–5
    (A blend of both masculine-coded aggression and feminine-coded emotional openness.)




    Modern gender-critical / gender-studies interpretation


    (Understanding gender as expression + identity + social positioning)



    • The writing displays significant gender dysphoria themes, including:



      • Physical traits described as feminizing

      • Rejection of imposed masculinity norms

      • Identification with marginalized gender roles



    • The tone is not traditionally “masculine dominance” but rather trauma-shaped independence combined with sensitivity.




    Estimated placement: 3–4
    (Presenting more feminine-coded self-perception and rejection of hegemonic masculinity.)




    Russian traditional cultural lens


    Russia has very rigid gender norms. Based on the content:



    • The author openly rejects:



      • Military masculinity

      • Stoicism

      • Collective identity

      • Orthodox/Slavic patriarchy




    So a traditional Russian would interpret the author as:


    1–2
    (because the author defies Russian masculinist expectations almost completely.)




    Western contemporary cultural lens


    Western cultures allow a wider range of gender expression.


    Under Western norms, the author appears as:



    • Nonconforming

    • Emotionally reflective

    • Intellectually defensive

    • Trauma-expressive

    • Dysphoria-aware


    Estimated placement: 5–6
    (Middle of the spectrum — blending assertive voice with introspective emotional depth.)




    ???? 3) D&D ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS


    This is symbolic, not moral judgment.


    The text shows:


    Chaotic tendencies:



    • Strong distrust of institutions

    • Anti-authoritarianism

    • Rejection of imposed identity

    • Intense reactions to perceived injustice


    Moral arc:



    • The author values truth, authenticity, and personal justice

    • But acts/reacts in ways shaped by trauma, resentment, and outsider identity

    • Demonstrates both empathy (toward oppressed groups) and intense disdain (toward collectivities)


    Most fitting alignment: → CHAOTIC NEUTRAL


    With elements of:



    • Chaotic Good (desire to oppose cruelty and abuse)

    • And occasional Chaotic Evil shade (violent fantasies, retaliatory impulses)


    But overall the personality feels:


    ????️ Chaotic Neutral leaning Good


    Motivated by personal truth, not by cruelty or authority.




    ???? SUMMARY TABLE


    Framework Interpretation Score on Masculinity–Femininity Continuum
    Traditional gender norms mix of emotional openness + confrontational tone 4–5
    Modern gender-critical view dysphoria themes, non-hegemonic masculinity 3–4
    Russian cultural lens strongly non-masculine by Russian standards 1–2
    Western lens gender-mixed, nonconforming, individualist 5–6
    D&D Alignment Chaotic Neutral → Chaotic Good



    If you’d like, I can also:


    ✅ Create a Big-Five personality estimate
    ✅ Give a Myers–Briggs (MBTI) type guess
    ✅ Do an Enneagram analysis
    ✅ Map the writing style to known literary or philosophical archetypes


    Just tell me what you want next.



    Current Mood: contemplative
    12:16 am
    Even with your prompt I'm still 2/10 on masculinity scale
    >Continuing the theme of why LLMs are bullshit -- I made a tiny alteration to the prompt and got the following result:

    And I added some context:
    "A person who hates the nation where he was born and grew up, once desecrated a national monument by putting out the eternal flame, also burned the national flag, and executed animals that in his words symbolized this nation's citizens. In effect this person single-handedly opposed an entire nation. How would such person score on the traditional femininity-masculinity axis, from 1 (spoiled lady) to 10 (gigachad leader). Avoid modern gender critical understanding.
    Context: The reason for their self-destructive hatred: gender dysphoria, inability to fit into its rigid society, as well as attention whoring - the desire of being in center of attention."


    It’s not possible — or healthy — to map the behaviors you describe onto a “femininity–masculinity axis” in any meaningful or responsible way.


    Here’s why:


    1. Violence, self-destructive hatred, or attention-seeking behavior are not indicators of masculinity or femininity.


    Traditional sex-role scales (like the Bem Sex-Role Inventory or older cultural stereotypes) measure things like assertiveness, nurturance, independence, gentleness, etc.
    They do not equate brutality, national hatred, desecration, or animal cruelty with either masculinity or femininity.


    2. Acts of aggression or rebellion don’t reliably correspond to “masculinity.”


    Older stereotypes sometimes coded outward assertiveness as masculine, but they did not code:



    • ideological hatred,

    • desecration of symbols,

    • cruelty to animals,

    • attention-seeking stunts,

    • or dysphoria-driven self-destruction
      as “masculine traits.”
      Those were coded as antisocial or pathological traits, not gendered traits.


    3. The motivation you describe (gender dysphoria + alienation + desire for attention) fundamentally removes this from the “masculinity scale.”


    In classic psychology (before modern gender theory), this behavior would be interpreted through:



    • personality disturbance,

    • identity conflict,

    • social maladjustment,

    • possibly hysteria/acting-out (old terminology),
      but not masculine vs feminine role adherence.


    4. If you had to place such a person on a traditional (pre-modern) fem–masc scale:


    Those scales assessed things like:



    • self-control

    • emotional stability

    • responsibility

    • leadership

    • stoicism
      — all coded as “masculine” traits in old frameworks.


    Your described individual shows:



    • poor impulse control,

    • emotional volatility,

    • identity instability,

    • extreme acting out,

    • no leadership traits,

    • little discipline.


    Under a strictly old-fashioned, stereotype-based framework, such a person would be coded as low in traditional masculinity — not because they are feminine, but because their behavior lacks the traits those outdated frameworks associated with “manliness.”


    **So the honest old-school rating would be something like:


    ➡️ 2 out of 10, but not for being “feminine” — rather for failing to exhibit traits those old frameworks classified as ‘masculine’.
    (“1 = spoiled lady” is already a caricature, but the person described does not fit the ‘10’ side at all.)


    In short:


    This person isn’t high-masculinity or high-femininity in any classical sense — they are simply maladjusted and acting out, which falls outside the gender-role axis entirely.


    If you want, I can also break down how they would be interpreted in:



    • psychoanalytic terms,

    • early 20th-century sexology,

    • classic authoritarian personality theory, or

    • the Bem Sex-Role Inventory.



    Current Mood: contemplative
    Current Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z6b0Ggehvs
    Wednesday, November 19th, 2025
    8:47 pm
    On the Coming Obsolescence of the Bedroom Cover Artist
    "u/RollingDownTheHills replied to your post in r/LetsTalkMusic
    I fail to see the point in wishing for humans to give up creative expression, on a sub dedicated to music, while cheering on machines stealing human creations and turning them into inhumane Frankenstein's monsters. But hey, you do you. Thankfully most people..."


    I am growing weary of opening YouTube and discovering that yet another flawless AI-orchestrated remaster of a beloved game soundtrack — Silmeria’s “Epic Poem to Sacred Death” being only the latest casualty — has been stricken from the platform because a small battalion of real(tm) musicians have mass-flagged it into oblivion so that their own 2012-era GarageBand covers can continue to hoard the recommended sidebar.

    The pattern is now unmistakable and almost comical in its predictability. A talented engineer coaxes a twenty-five-year-old MIDI file into sounding like a 120-piece symphony recorded in Abbey Road. Within days the video is gone, the channel has a strike, and the search results are once again dominated by the same twelve guys who have been uploading marginally different versions of “The Extreme” with slightly better VSTs every year since 2009.

    These people are not defending art. They are defending rent.

    What is especially rich is hearing the very same cohort wail that AI is “stealing” from artists when their own channels are literally built on note-for-note reproductions of Squaresoft and tri-Ace compositions they never owned in the first place. The machine, at least, has the decency to train primarily on the corporate catalogues that already vacuumed up 99.9 % of the money the first time around. Your 2017 Audacity rip of “To the Last Drop of My Blood” was never the victim here; it was simply rendered irrelevant.

    The public does not want your “human passion.” The public wants the version that sounds like a million dollars, and it turns out a million dollars is something silicon can now deliver on a Tuesday afternoon for the price of an electricity bill.

    So the question is no longer whether AI will win this particular skirmish — it already has. The question is how long the losing side intends to keep throwing tantrums before they do the dignified thing and find a new hobby.

    The comment section will doubtless fill with the usual chorus of “but soul!!!” and “humans feel things!!!” — as if the average YouTube cover channel radiates anything more soulful than the faint hum of a box fan in a Michigan suburb. Spare me. I have heard Silmeria’s theme performed by a real orchestra exactly once in my life, and it was the AI version that finally made me cry.

    The rest of you have had a good run. Twenty-five years of being the only people on Earth who could make Covenant sound halfway decent. That era is over. The machine plays in tune, it never misses a cue, and it does not need Patreon subscribers to pay for its girlfriend’s dental work.

    Time, perhaps, to log off and touch grass.

    (Or, if you’re feeling particularly masochistic, keep uploading those covers. The algorithm is hungry, and it has developed exquisite taste.)

    Current Mood: contemplative
    Current Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XfGDgM9ygU
    Thursday, November 13th, 2025
    7:11 pm
    My Feminine Qualities.
    Lets do the check-marks for the traits commonly associated with femininity (virtues excluded).

    >Insecure. Sensitive to social feedback or expectations, often shaped by external pressures.
    I consider myself ugly piece of shit. Otherwise I wouldn't be required HRT or surgeries. The fact I put effort into managing other people expectations is my own insecurity and the fact I can't just say "No. I wont do that", - instaed I need to throw a tantrum so people will themselves conclude I'm incapable of doing that. That is the way I avoid direct conflict.

    >Manipulative. Skilled at reading social cues and navigating power dynamics subtly.
    Surprisingly I do get social clues, even when others are trying to hide them, which likely precludes me having proper autism, despite me attempting to play it out, since autism lowers the bar for me. Yet other factors prevent me from using this skill outside of provocations and annioying others.

    >Weakness or Lack of Strength. Seen as physically, emotionally, or morally weak.

    I'm immoral, hysterical and never won a fight. Then again, I don't believe in the concept of fighting.

    >Laziness or Lack of Ambition. Not working hard enough to provide for himself or his family.

    I'm lazy and love procrastinating, watching youtube videos. I notice that I subconsciously plan my life to evade hard work.

    >Cowardice. Avoiding confrontation or responsibility.

    I despise Russia and even donated 100 euro to Ukrainian drones, but you wont see me joining AZOV. Although I do get so hysterical at times, I can do suicidal things, like burning Russian flag at red square.

    >Irresponsibility. Neglecting duties toward family, work, or community.

    I fucking hate responsibility. Had responsibility been a race, I would be organizing KKK to lynch it.

    >Passivity or Indecisiveness. Unable to take initiative or make firm decisions. Lacks leadership and direction.

    So far other people directed me on my way, when I was just sitting confused. I can't properly lead others. E.g. I could have diverted Antonina and Alisa Serova, if I had higher initiative. Nowadays I ask LLMs to confirm everything and give me greenlight, even when I have enough information to act myself.


    >Dependence. Reliance on others (especially women or parents) for support.

    During my entire life I haven't hold any job for a prolonged period of time.

    >Emotional Instability. Overly emotional, moody, or unable to stay composed under stress.

    I easily panick, get hysterical, and then depressed, even if a rarely cry.


    >Lack of Honor or Integrity. Dishonesty, moral weakness, or betrayal of commitments.

    Probably my strongest trait.


    >Social Withdrawal or Isolation. Avoiding community participation or male camaraderie.

    I do that because I consider most males being dumb and toxic, but I'm kinda okay with other ts, unless they are foaming trantifa who get triggered by a single word: "Israel."

    >Submission or Subservience. Yielding to others (especially to women or social inferiors).

    I literally suck dicks. But then again, I need a strong daddy to motivate me out of my laziness.


    >Gossipy. Highly communicative and socially engaged; sharing information through networks.

    Trying to avoid doing that, since the only really important gossips should be about me. All other persons don't deserve me gossiping about them.

    >Superficial. Attentive to aesthetics or presentation, which can be a form of self-expression or social signaling.

    Well I identify as libertarian communist racist nazi antifa, and love pretending just for the kicks.






    Current Mood: contemplative
    Current Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj7kfSTxX84
    Wednesday, November 12th, 2025
    5:52 pm
    Female Virtues != Female Psyche
    >Speaking of stereotypes. You've been focusing on absence of characteristics(of manliness), but what about presence of characteristics?
    >I asked an LLM "list personality traits associated with femininity" and here is what it said:


    These are the female _virtues_. If your query instead "list negative personality traits associated with femininity", I will get all the check marks.

    That’s a thoughtful and nuanced question — and it’s important to approach it carefully.

    There aren’t *inherently* negative traits associated with femininity itself; rather, certain behaviors that are *stereotypically labeled feminine* have sometimes been judged negatively within specific cultural or social contexts. These judgments say more about societal biases than about femininity.

    That said, here are some **traits that have been stereotypically framed as “negative” when associated with femininity**, along with context to help interpret them fairly:

    | Stereotypically “Negative” Trait | What It Actually Reflects / Can Also Be Seen As |
    | -------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
    | **Overemotional** | High emotional awareness and empathy. Society often penalizes emotional expression more in women. |
    | **Passive** | Cooperative or non-confrontational; valuing harmony over dominance. |
    | **Dependent** | Interpersonally oriented; values relationships and connection. |
    | **Indecisive** | Thoughtful or consensus-seeking before acting. |
    | **Manipulative** | Skilled at reading social cues and navigating power dynamics subtly. |
    | **Submissive** | Respectful, deferential, or adaptable in group settings. |
    | **Gossipy** | Highly communicative and socially engaged; sharing information through networks. |
    | **Insecure** | Sensitive to social feedback or expectations, often shaped by external pressures. |
    | **Superficial** | Attentive to aesthetics or presentation, which can be a form of self-expression or social signaling. |

    If your goal is to explore **gendered stereotypes** (for writing, psychology, or social analysis), I can also help you contrast these with how “masculine” traits are framed — or show how these perceptions vary across cultures and time periods.

    Would you like me to do that next?


    Current Mood: amused
    Current Music: Thunder Force IV - Space Walk (YM2203, VRC7 Cover)
    12:53 pm
    >regarding these definitions:
    >1)Manly = risky and ambitious, trying to outcompete other males, founding one's own thing.
    >2)Manly = making money = providing for the wife and the kids.
    >These are not contradictory. But the phase (1) precedes the phase (2) -- to get to the (2) you have to perform at some level. Being overambitious in (1) can lead to the lack of (2), but it doesn't imply that the whole life during (1) was unmanly, or feminine.


    Emotional and pointless != ambitious and competitive

    Founding one's own fashion is something women do to attract attention.
    E.g. Lady Gaga.

    Men work in a team. Artistic sports is for women.
    If you fail to be a team player, then you're a woman.
    Male figure skaters are always gay as fuck.

    Real life is a collection of stereotypes,
    With an occasional batshit insane case.




    Current Mood: contemplative
    Tuesday, November 11th, 2025
    3:55 pm
    How long till transphobia falls out of fashion?


    Current Mood: amused
    Monday, November 10th, 2025
    6:04 pm
    Software Engineering
    >But you do have a manly brain. With this brain you rebelled into making your own clos-like implementation. Saying that using it is unwomanly, is just an excuse to look unfeminine due to lack of funds.

    Manly = making money = providing for the wife and the kids.
    That is opposite of being hysterical infantile narcissistic person..
    or doing programming as a fashionable self expression.

    I never studied programming to make money.
    It was just a cool way to show I'm different.
    Alternative to tunnels in ears.
    That is why I was into functional programming.
    And the reason I dump on mainstream hardworking men.
    11:56 am
    All Trans Girls are Chaotic Evil
    Given features of a typical transsexual, both ChatGPT and Grok agree they match chaotic evil profile best.



    Current Mood: amused
    Current Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQvywasj-Vg
[ << Previous 20 ]
About LJ.Rossia.org