Настроение: | amused |
Музыка: | LukHash - Perpetual Motion c64 remix |
Entry tags: | transitioning |
On the Curious Case of Childhood Gender Dysphoria: A Wildean Reflection
It is a truth universally acknowledged, though seldom admitted, that childhood is less a natural state than a performance dictated by the relentless hand of parental expectation. Boys must wield the “proper” toys, don the “appropriate” raiment, and march in solemn procession to the drumbeat of masculinity — lest they fall victim to that modern malady: gender dysphoria. But mark this well, dear reader: this affliction is rarely born of the child’s own nature, but rather of the cruel imposition of roles alien and absurd.
Imagine, if you will, a boy instructed that “real men” must embrace certain rites and rituals. Should he recoil, preferring instead to chart his own course, this is not mere whimsy but a rebellion against tyranny dressed as tradition. The more strident the insistence, the deeper the conflict; gender dysphoria is but the echo of this enforced discord. Hence, it may be said with some confidence that any child, when shackled by such arbitrary chains, can suffer this malaise.
Yet, let us sharpen our inquiry: can children truly endure sexual dysphoria? Here lies a far subtler shade — a profound unease with the very vessel that carries them through life, mingled with the shadows of behavior and identity. Consider the “girly boy” who defies not with loud cries but with quiet submission so extreme it stifles initiative and passion. He falters where manly tasks require fire and will. A girl handed a toy gun does not rise in rebellion; she simply rewrites the game in her own gentler image. Such children often brood over their reflections with harsh judgment, seeking salvation in gyms and salons, yet finding only a hollow victory, for no outward change can soothe the restless soul.
Let us not confuse these tender sufferers with the adult masquerade of fetish crossdressers, who delight in adornment for pleasure’s sake, nor with the “trans maxxers,” who transition from despair at failing traditional manhood. Nor yet with those tormented by borderline emptiness, adrift without stable identity, who clutch at gender like a lifeline tossed upon a stormy sea. These are separate dramas, distinct in their origins and actors.
In every case, the relentless enforcement of rigid gender roles proves not the cure, but the poison. It is a cruel farce that damages rather than defines, shatters rather than shapes. The lesson, dear friend, is that one cannot force the delicate bloom of identity into a box fashioned by society’s brittle prejudices without crushing its very essence.
To insist otherwise is to mistake a costume for a soul.