I disagree. LJ would be a publisher, if it would make my documents public without my participation, beside the creation and consent. In reality, the process of making anything public makes the user the main and the only actor. His intention is the only driving force. The LJ role is purely technical, which makes it a provider.

And as such it cannot be responsible for the content it is entrusted with. Let's suppose a bank makes me sign agreement by which it has rights at any moment and on its discretion to cancel my account and burn the money. What would you say to that?

I think the right thing to do would be to discredit TOS Termination clause in its present form.

(Reply to this) (Parent)