tiphareth: верхний пост

(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)

	(Анонимно) 2018-09-17 03:28 (ссылка)
	Что это за гадина такая? https://life.ru/t/новости/1152688/laurieat_nobielievskoi_priemii_mira_prizvala_smi_pieriestat_diemonizirovat_rossiiu Пипец (Ответить) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	tiphareth 2018-09-17 10:24 (ссылка)
	какая-то ебанутая SJW-антисемитка (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	(Анонимно) 2018-09-17 19:59 (ссылка)
	Сжв рашку любить не будет - потому что рашка это тирания, диктатура и антилорерантность на всех уровней. (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

tiphareth
2018-09-17 20:50 (ссылка)

тупой анон такой тупой
https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-putin-played-the-far-left

...Тhe past 18 months have seen a noted spike in
information warfare aimed at gulling the Bernie Bros and
Occupy-besotted alternative-media set, which saw Clinton
as more of a political danger than it did Trump.

Perhaps the starkest case in point is Green Party
presidential candidate Jill Stein and her constituency. In
December 2015, the Kremlin feted Stein by inviting her to
the gala celebrating the 10-year anniversary of
Kremlin-funded propaganda network RT. Over a year later,
it remains unclear who paid for Stein's trip to Moscow and
her accommodations there. Her campaign ignored multiple
questions on this score. We do know, however, that Stein
sat at the same table as both Putin and Lt. Gen. Mike
Flynn, Trump's soon-to-be national security adviser. She
further spoke at an RT-sponsored panel, using her presence
to criticize the U.S.'s "disastrous militarism."
Afterward, straddling Moscow's Red Square, Stein described
the panel as "inspiring," going on to claim that Putin,
whom she painted as a political novice, told her he
"agree[d]" with her "on many issues."

Stein presents herself as a champion of the underclass and
the environment, and an opponent of the surveillance state
and corporate media, and yet she seemed to take pleasure
in her marriage of true minds with a kleptocratic
intelligence officer who levels forests and arrests or
kills critical journalists and invades foreign
countries. Their true commonality, of course, is that both
Putin and Stein are dogged opponents of U.S. foreign
policy.

Indeed, her pro-Kremlin stance wasn't limited to merely
praising Putin's amicability. Stein joined the Russian
president and Kazakhstani dictator Nursultan Nazarbayev in
describing Ukraine's 2014 EuroMaidan revolution as a
"coup," and claimed, bizarrely, that NATO is currently
"fighting... enemies we invent to give the weapons industry
a reason to sell more stuff."

For good measure, she also asserted in September that
"Russia used to own Ukraine," by way of defending its
colonization. She even selected a vice-presidential
candidate who, when asked whether the downing of Flight
MH17-a massacre almost certainly caused by
Russian-supplied separatists in eastern Ukraine-was a
false flag, responded, "[T]hat's exactly what has
happened."

For her efforts in burnishing Kremlin conspiracy theories
for American audiences, Stein was awarded not simply with
an invitation to the 2015 RT gala, but RT even hosted her
party's 2016 presidential debate-a move Stein hailed as a
"step towards real democracy." RT also covered "live
updates" from Stein's reactions to the debates between
Clinton and Trump, a decision Stein further praised. This
mutual affection is, naturally, of a piece with RT's
broader modus operandi in the U.S.

As I helped catalog at the Columbia Journalism School, RT,
rather than focus solely on puffing up GOP candidates,
expends more effort in targeting America's far-left
fellow-travelers. There's a reason, after all, that
Kremlin-funded Sputnik hosts podcasts by Americans who
claim "progressive" viewpoints-at least when it comes to
altering the exclusively domestic landscape in
America. Nor are these fake news outlets tilling fallow
soil.

Consider one of the flagship magazines of the American
left, which, for all its support of gay rights, government
transparency, and voting rights as they pertain to
U.S. society, has developed a notoriously soft spot for a
regime that violently opposes all of the above.

The Nation's crop of Russia watchers have lately busied
themselves by lending credence to the "autonomy
referendums" in eastern Ukraine, thus legitimizing illegal
and neo-imperialist land-grabs, or notions that the entire
Ukrainian crisis was "instigated by the West's attempt... to
smuggle [Ukraine] into NATO."

Stein, The Nation, and WikiLeaks are hardly outliers on
social media or insignificant in their political reach; to
their respective audiences, they wield as much influence
as Breitbart does with Trump loyalists.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	(Анонимно) 2018-09-17 20:59 (ссылка)
	миша, не преувеличивайте всем похуй на сраную бензоколонку, где орудуют бандиты, убийцы и отравители (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	tiphareth 2018-09-18 01:10 (ссылка)
	Stein, The Nation, and WikiLeaks are hardly outliers on social media or insignificant in their political reach; to their respective audiences, they wield as much influence as Breitbart does with Trump loyalists. (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	(Анонимно) 2018-09-18 12:45 (ссылка)
	миша, вы носитесь со своим Stein, The Nation, and WikiLeaks, как дурак с писаной торбой. (Ответить) (Уровень выше)

	kaledin 2018-09-18 01:18 (ссылка)
	Stein, между прочим, подарила выборы Трампу: если бы все, за нее голосовавшие, не маялись дурью на проголосовали как надо, это хватало. (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	(Анонимно) 2018-09-18 03:16 (ссылка)
	спешите видеть, москальской армяшке надо чтобы америкосы голосовали за хуиллари (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	(Анонимно) 2018-09-18 08:19 (ссылка)
	спешите видеть, руснявому путиноиду надо чтобы америкосы голосовали за трампа (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	(Анонимно) 2018-09-18 17:49 (ссылка)
	спешите видеть: москальская армяшка посралась с руснявым путиноидом (Ответить) (Уровень выше)

	(Анонимно) 2018-09-18 12:43 (ссылка)
	спешите видеть, очередной идиот с "подарили выборы трампу" как ты ложку до рта доносишь-то? (Ответить) (Уровень выше)

	(Анонимно) 2018-09-18 08:09 (ссылка)
	Для сжв всё, что конфликтует с США - хорошее. Ты путаешь сжв с прогрессивными либералами всякими (да, не одно и тоже). (Ответить) (Уровень выше)

(Читать комментарии) -