"Right against compelled listening" как интерпретация первой поправки на данный момент не существует.

https://www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/bulr/volume89n3/documents/CORBIN.pdf Почитай. Пишет, что такое право должно быть.

"Even assuming they contain viewpoint-based state messages, most training programs designed to combat discrimination in the workplace easily survive strict scrutiny. The most common versions of diversity training are meant to create a productive, discrimination-free workplace and protect people from certain types of harassment. Such goals are consistent with and are indeed required by laws like Title VII – itself inspired by the constitutional mandate of the Equal Protection Clause – and clearly represent a compelling state interest. Furthermore, programs providing information about what is permissible and impermissible under the law are well tailored to achieve these goals. Consequently, just as the state may bar employees from uttering discriminatory speech in the workplace, so may it mandate lessons to ensure that employees understand what counts as discriminatory speech in the workplace. Though free speech rights are implicated, in neither case are they violated."