Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет Misha Verbitsky ([info]tiphareth)
@ 2023-01-31 11:00:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Настроение: sick
Музыка:Деда План Планыч - ШАМБАЛА ШАМАНА
Entry tags:covid, smeshnoe

ковид-1984
Из РОНО пришло новое указание, как надо складывать дроби.

As a medical student and researcher, I staunchly supported

the efforts of the public health authorities when it came
to COVID-19. I believed that the authorities responded to
the largest public health crisis of our lives with
compassion, diligence, and scientific expertise. I was
with them when they called for lockdowns, vaccines, and
boosters.

I was wrong. We in the scientific community were
wrong. And it cost lives.

I can see now that the scientific community from the CDC
to the WHO to the FDA and their representatives,
repeatedly overstated the evidence and misled the public
about its own views and policies, including on natural
vs. artificial immunity, school closures and disease
transmission, aerosol spread, mask mandates, and vaccine
effectiveness and safety, especially among the young. All
of these were scientific mistakes at the time, not in
hindsight. Amazingly, some of these obfuscations continue
to the present day.

But perhaps more important than any individual error was
how inherently flawed the overall approach of the
scientific community was, and continues to be. It was
flawed in a way that undermined its efficacy and resulted
in thousands if not millions of preventable deaths.

А не как раньше, числитель с числителем,
знаменатель со знаменателем.

Можно будет поржать, наблюдая как ковидобесы,
выяснив от роно, как складывать дроби, теперь заявят
"а я еще до войны об этом говорил господину
окружному начальнику" и сошлются на статью Бибиси
о том, что Остазия всегда воевала с Океанией.

Вот уж действительно, ковид-1984.

Привет



(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)


(Анонимно)
2023-02-01 09:54 (ссылка)
> зомбоящик шизофренически транслировал оба мнения

никаких нахуй мнений кроме "носи намордник, коли шмурдяк" он не транслировал, пиздабол ты

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]tiphareth
2023-02-01 10:18 (ссылка)

https://www.revistacomunicar.com/html/72/en/72-2022-03.html

The six identified emphasis frames are distributed as follows: in more than half of the coded corpus, a frame on the Superiority of the Sputnik V Vaccine (53.96%) is employed, while 19.81% of articles report on deaths and side effects due to vaccine inoculation, a frame which was named Fatal/Side Effects of EU Authorized Vaccines. There is also some prevalent discourse on Limitations of Individual Rights and Freedoms (15.84%), and discourse indicating that the European and Romanian authorities struggle in managing the health crisis (6.03%). Children and Teenager`s Protection (2.64%) and Big Pharma Conspiracy (1.69%) were identified in similar percentages.

The Superiority of the Sputnik V Vaccine frame encompasses a variety of topics related to the Russian vaccine and constantly emphasizes how this serum is better than EU authorised vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson). The Russian vaccine’s advantages are clinically demonstrated: it “can protect against all known variants” (Sputnik, 2021a). The same idea is supported by using statistical evidence: “New data: Sputnik V, 97.6% efficient” (Sputnik, 2021b). In headlines such as “Gamaleya: Sputnik V can protect against all known variants” (Sputnik, 2021a), an appeal to authority is employed (argumentum ab auctoritate), as the Russian Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology is frequently cited by ro.sputnik.md.

The Fatal/Side Effects of EU Authorized Vaccines frame could be identified in headline constructions such as: “Huge scandal: three deceased after Pfizer vaccination!” (Sputnik, 2021c), where the syntagm "huge scandal" functions as a marker for the severity of the situation. There are also allegations that vaccines could cause death, even at an early age (all of them, except Sputnik V): “High-school student deceased after Pfizer vaccine – devastated family, “Sofia was healthy” (Sputnik, 2021d). This frame is constructed through a life-death opposition: “was healthy”/ “deceased after vaccine”.

The Limitations of Individual Rights and Freedoms frame is identified as a form of moral evaluation of the pandemic’s effects: “A Romanian MEP compares mandatory vaccination with nazism” (Sputnik, 2021e). Negative words such as “nazism” and “mandatory” are used to emphasize potential human rights violations. Following the same idea, another headline reads “Cristian Terheș attacks European Parliament’s “democracy” harshly – Video” (Sputnik, 2021f), where Terheș, a Romanian Member of the European Parliament (MEP), criticizes the democratic principles of the EU. Another headline references a Romanian lawyer’s statement on freedom, using a metaphor: “Chitic: Our freedom’s winter began” (Sputnik, 2021g).

The analysis of the relevant negative lexis is firstly based on the association with the COVID-19 virus/infections/disease (frequency threshold=10; Figure 6: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19328729). The negative news value is construed through words/n-grams which refer to death: “death”, “death rate”, “fatal”; disease: “infection”, “disease”, “oncologic”; side effects: “adverse”, “blood clot”, “thrombosis”, “coagulation”; restrictions and interdictions: “suspend”, “sanction”, “infringe”, “interdict”; or warnings: “risk”, “negative”, “concern”, “shocking”, “prevent”, “panic”.

The most frequent words constructing negativity are “infection”: “Norway is demanding the purchase of the Sputnik V vaccine amid a record number of infections” (Sputnik, 2021h), “Mirel Curea's strange infection scandal. Dr. Razvan Constantinescu's harsh reaction” (Sputnik, 2021i); “risk”, seen in headlines in which an authority’s opinion is used as evidence to intensify distrust: “A virologist explains the risks of a vaccine created too quickly” (Sputnik, 2020a) or “Doctors, warning about a decision of the Ministry of Health: increases the risk of death” (Sputnik 2021j). The word “death” is the third most frequent negative word and is employed in the news of deaths caused by EU-approved vaccines: “Indonesia suspends a batch of AstraZeneca doses after the death of a vaccine victim” (Sputnik, 2021k).

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Читать комментарии) -