tolerate

Windows HOME will reenable this shit on update anyway. It's fighting windmills.

suck it

>there will be issues running some legacy apps.

It won't send telemetry though that such legacy apps are installed on this PC. So I don't see an issue. The list is "full paranoia mode" anyway, of course there are sacrifices to pay for that.

>incompatible apps, doing `rm -rf /` due to bad programming.

The number of such apps isn't large, and most of the shit is gated behind popup security permission dialogue box anyway, when run from non-Administaror account.

Also such behaviors are likely well known, and such level of protection isn't needed for a person who is willing to disable all the shit to prevent surveillance. So your argument is moot. This isn't anywhere near the "Патч Бармина".

>disable sending diagnostics to Microsoft.

I'm too lazy to research this subject now, but in Windows 10 such disablings weren't a reliable way to stop telemetry activity.

>But diagnostics is there for a reason:

Anal probes and government oversights are there always for some "reasons" of course. Safety above all!

>but Microsoft always solves things the retarded way.

Microsoft, Windows wise, is riding on the "we are established and backward compatible". They could have rearchitected everything from ground up, for the current needs and threats, but that would have undermined their quasi-monopoly.

But that's an entirely different discussion altogether.

>then just stop using the internet.

Stopping using internet while living in a city with internet and not being elderly is also a statistical anomaly, probably inferable in some way.

>The content of your HDD is far less important than what you access and publish.

It depends. But in anti-myth case you are probably right.

Use Linux (not System-D versions) slackware, gentoo, etc.

You can't prefer what you don't use and what isn't usable on the modern hardware.

Yes, "runs", on older Raspberry pi models, without working wifi, any kind of graphical acceleration, or a modern browser ported to it. "running" it once and then immediately turning it off is about as useful as it can get today.

It means it's not working.

You don't know whether it works. It's some porting project from 2005, which supposedly worked through a unix emulation layer.

This can't be considered as a modern browser.

They offer updated web standards support. Modern websites would literally refuse to work with a browser this old.

>Who needs these?

anyone who wants to watch videos on youtube or twitter like you do.

Typical arguing session with Sadkov -- the taking of the more absurd positions with every next comment.

What a lying hypocrite. "Preferer"

And hearing "more productive" from you is hilarious. According to you "more productive forms of entertainment" involves making single user language and games for dead OSs and ancient hardware.

>doing obscure shit nobody needs or wants is PRODUCTIVE!! PRODUCTIVE I SAID!!!!

ok

Yes, hide behind relativism.

If every second concept you communicate in is "relativistic", meaning "diverges significantly from the mainstream understanding", why do you even use English to communicate? Why not communicate in your own language? Inventing your own programming language is a half-measure. Your own sovereign natural language is where the real shit is.

In other words:

"I'm not evil because I have my own definition of evil"

"I'm productive, because I have my own definition of productivity"

"I'm smart, because I have my own definition of smart"

"I'm civilized, because I have my own definition of civilized"

etc. etc.

With this amount of redefinition I can only see your refusal to accept the transgender redefinition of "bald bearded cross-dressers" as women as highly hypocritical. You can redefine "productive" and "evil", but they can't redefine "woman". How come?

Are you upset that they succeeded, but your definitions will forever remain yours alone?

>I left Russia, cuz people there lectured me.
Ты сбежала т.к. на тебя заведены уголовные дела.
>"Girls are too responsible defending motherland!!!"
На Западе женщин не призывают. Даже если и начнут, тебе это все равно не грозит по возрасту.

when redefinitions spread, become accepted, these are the consequences. For example if your redefinitions of certain groups as non-humans became mainstream there would be drastically more dire consequences.

And we already verified that whether transgender ideology have any actual effect on your access to medical care is highly questionable (capitalist insurer profits and your abrasiveness are more suspect), while "telling you how to live" actually amounts to "stop dehumanizing bearded women with female penises", i.e "get the fuck out with your redefinitions, we have ours"

It isn't limited to Russians. Read your own shit.

Anyway, I also prefer flying on private jets and being a billionaire with a giant dick, and lots of beautiful women.

It was a sarcastic remark. It's "prefer" in the same unrealized sense as you use this word, it doesn't imply "can".

этот анти-миф какой-то умственной отсталый бумер из деревни