Настроение:	sick
Музыка:	Tangerine Dream - Coventry 1975
Entry tags:	clinton, usa

suppression of free speech and intolerance
Занятное
http://www.salon.com/2016/06/06/this_is_our_neoliberal_nightmare_hillary_clinton_donald_trump_and_why_the_market_and_the_wealthy_win_every_time/
про новый формат неолиберального консенсуса,
представленный Хиллари. Типа, мультикультурализм
и феминизм и SJW как фундамент для корпоративного
государства и всевластия крупного капитала. При этом
основной враг для "мультикультурных неолибералов"
это свой же собственный белый андеркласс (аватаром
которого является Трамп) и пауперы, которых они
преимущественно уничтожают, давая разнообразные
преимущества мультикультурным.

Очень убедительно, хоть и Салон (который сам типа
SJW нумеро уно).

Есть вообще изрядное количество американцев, которые
поддерживали Сандерса, а за отсутствием Сандерса
поддерживают Трампа. Типа, оба за бедных, за рабочий
класс. Есть основания к тому, хотя в университетах
их и нет, по крайней мере я не слышал ни про одного
любителя Трампа (я про математиков, физиков и типа).

This is the dark side of neoliberalism's ideological arm
(a multiculturalism founded on human beings as capital),
which is why this project has become increasingly
associated with suppression of free speech and intolerance
of those who refuse to go along with the kind of identity
politics neoliberalism promotes.

And this explains why the 1990s saw the simultaneous and
absolutely parallel rise, under the Clintons, of both
neoliberal globalization and various regimes of neoliberal
disciplining, such as the shaming and exclusion of former
welfare recipients (every able-bodied person should be
able to find work, therefore under TANF welfare was
converted to a performance management system designed to
enroll everyone in the workforce, even if it meant
below-subsistence wages or the loss of parental
responsibilities, all of it couched in the jargon of
marketplace incentives).

The actual cost to the state of the AFDC program was
minimal, but its symbolism was incalculable. The end of
welfare went hand in hand with the disciplinary "crime
bill" pushed by the Clintons, leading to an epidemic of
mass incarceration. Neoliberalism, unlike classical
liberalism, does not permit a fluidity of self-expression
as an occasional participant in the market, and posits
prison as the only available alternative for anyone not
willing to conceive of themselves as being present fully
and always in the market.

I believe that the generation of people-in their forties
or older-supporting Hillary have already internalized
neoliberal subjectivity, which they like to frame as
realism or pragmatism, refusing for instance to accept
that free college or health care are even theoretical
possibilities. After all, they have maintained a measure
of success in the past three or four decades after
conceptualizing themselves as marketplace agents. Just as
the Tea Party supporters found it intolerable that
government should help irresponsible homeowners by bailing
them out of unsustainable debt, the Clinton supporters
hold essentially the same set of beliefs toward those who
dare to think of themselves outside the discipline of the
market.

Все так, да.

Вот тут немного про автора
http://home.earthlink.net/~platter/people/shivani.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anis-shivani/

Привет