Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет Misha Verbitsky ([info]tiphareth)
@ 2023-01-31 11:00:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Настроение: sick
Музыка:Деда План Планыч - ШАМБАЛА ШАМАНА
Entry tags:covid, smeshnoe

ковид-1984
Из РОНО пришло новое указание, как надо складывать дроби.

As a medical student and researcher, I staunchly supported

the efforts of the public health authorities when it came
to COVID-19. I believed that the authorities responded to
the largest public health crisis of our lives with
compassion, diligence, and scientific expertise. I was
with them when they called for lockdowns, vaccines, and
boosters.

I was wrong. We in the scientific community were
wrong. And it cost lives.

I can see now that the scientific community from the CDC
to the WHO to the FDA and their representatives,
repeatedly overstated the evidence and misled the public
about its own views and policies, including on natural
vs. artificial immunity, school closures and disease
transmission, aerosol spread, mask mandates, and vaccine
effectiveness and safety, especially among the young. All
of these were scientific mistakes at the time, not in
hindsight. Amazingly, some of these obfuscations continue
to the present day.

But perhaps more important than any individual error was
how inherently flawed the overall approach of the
scientific community was, and continues to be. It was
flawed in a way that undermined its efficacy and resulted
in thousands if not millions of preventable deaths.

А не как раньше, числитель с числителем,
знаменатель со знаменателем.

Можно будет поржать, наблюдая как ковидобесы,
выяснив от роно, как складывать дроби, теперь заявят
"а я еще до войны об этом говорил господину
окружному начальнику" и сошлются на статью Бибиси
о том, что Остазия всегда воевала с Океанией.

Вот уж действительно, ковид-1984.

Привет



(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)


(Анонимно)
2023-01-31 19:51 (ссылка)
и откуда же, если не секрет? я только в /r/conspiracy это видел ещё

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

Newsweek
(Анонимно)
2023-02-01 08:44 (ссылка)
Kremlin critic Valery Solovei claimed in 2020 that Putin had cancer and Parkinson's disease and that he had undergone emergency surgery that year.

Political analyst and Kremlin critic Valery Solovei has long claimed Putin had cancer, as well as Parkinson's disease

Valery Solovei, who allegedly used to be head of the public relations department at the Moscow State Institute of Internal Relations, was quoted by The Sun in the 2020 story as saying that he could not give a medical diagnosis on Putin but that Kremlin sources "at the epicenter of decision making" had told him of Putin's alleged ailments.

In 2020, British newspaper The Sun suggested Putin may have both cancer and Parkinson's, citing Valarey Solovei, an alleged former head of the public relations department at the Moscow State Institute of Internal Relations, who has long maintained that Putin is unwell.

Then, at the end of April, British tabloid The Sun reported that Russian media outlet General SVR had quoted a "Kremlin's insider" as saying that the 69-year-old Putin was to undergo a cancer operation, although the nature of the specific operation was unspecified.

Rumors have also been stoked by anonymously-run Telegram account General SVR, which has reported that Putin is due to undergo an operation. The account is purportedly run by a former Russian Foreign Intelligence Service official.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

scientists are faggots
(Анонимно)
2023-02-01 14:43 (ссылка)
fact

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


[info]kaledin
2023-02-01 11:50 (ссылка)
Дебил принес. Ниже причем хвастается (дебил же).

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Читать комментарии) -