Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет nancygold ([info]nancygold)
@ 2024-07-20 17:12:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Настроение: accomplished
Entry tags:computing

Symta Rewrite Progress
Ok. I've updated the ECS system to use new tagged pointer system.
No changes to the type system were needed.
Yet I had to update the object creation byte code.
Now it returns an enum style tag for 0-sized objects.


Generally having these enums is useful for stuff like Nil or Empty lists.
Previously allocated these on heap, which slowed down garbage collection.
And obviously typed enums instead of raw integers are nice too.
Yet compared to C/C++ everything is dynamic, so I can convert a string to enum.
I.e. now it feels a bit more flexible and useful.

Here is how one can implement enums using this mechanism

CityNames: amsterdam kyiv moscow
type city Name: = Me = ref_ tag_(Me): CityNames.locate Name
city.as_text = "#<city:[CityNames.(gid_ Me)]>"
City city kyiv
say City //prints #<city:kyiv>


Too lazy to test the performance of the game before and after.
And it ran at 60 FPS before anyway.
Yet I can finally convert every terrain cell into an entity.
That was one of the major reasons I had to improve runtime.



(Добавить комментарий)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-20 18:19 (ссылка)
Нахуя вообще приводить примеры кода, если никто с языком не знаком, документации нет, up to date кода нет, нихуя нет. Что это за пердеж в пустоту?

>Too lazy to test the performance of the game before and after.

Typical.

(Ответить) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-20 18:38 (ссылка)
At had one version at ucoz long time ago (see https://sym.at.ua/load/symcraft_v0_1/1-1-0-3 )

that was before my transitioning

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-20 19:36 (ссылка)
And? This isn't a github/gitlab page with documentation examples, rationale etc. As you say, every retard has their own lisp clone, why should one invest any time in researching some shit example from the .ua domain?

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-20 20:12 (ссылка)
>shit example from the .ua domain

Sorry. I will add TRIGGER WARNING next time.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-20 21:31 (ссылка)
I could have as well been .ru or .br domain. I avoid all these.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-20 22:05 (ссылка)
racist

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-20 19:45 (ссылка)
And it's from 12 years ago. Like what?

>that was before my transitioning

Again with this gender "trannies are superior" bullshit. You should now that real non-tranny women don't attempt to create programming languages, because real non-tranny women prefer low risk, well trodden paths, that don't challenge them too much, that are more likely to guarantee wealth and health to their (real or potential) children. You doing this programming language founder, reversing, low/no-reward/extreme-risk shit is all due to your male heritage.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-20 20:14 (ссылка)
Mentally ill people of both sexes do extreme risk / no reward things.
For example, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgFyrhzvkSQ

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-20 21:46 (ссылка)
First of all the statistics shows this kind of violence is committed by (true) females drastically less often.

Second, this isn't about being mentally ill, healthy men do risky shit to potentially increase the chances of reaching some state that would increase probability of their genes passing to the next generation. Being a prominent programming language creator or a game developer is one of these states. Humans are sexually dimorphic, and that includes psychology. Women genes have a different strategy. This isn't some deviant behavior. Killing your mother on the other hand is, so you are intentionally confusing the phenomena.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-20 21:56 (ссылка)
>Women genes have a different strategy.

Brainoed here a litte. More correct would be "human genes in a female individual."

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-20 22:07 (ссылка)
For me programming is like solving crossword puzzles...
While staying in a mental ward.
Just trying to get entertained.
Worse than drugs, alcohol and suicide?
Sorry, I have bad tastes.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-20 22:13 (ссылка)
>This isn't some deviant behavior.

It is not deviant when you're doing it for some goal.
I.e. getting rich, building a portfolio, gaining respect.
That was never a goal for me.
If they cancel my welfare, I will just go shoplifting.
Not looking for any IT job.

But I do love annoying people.
Somehow I get enjoyment when stupid people get angry.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-20 23:26 (ссылка)
>That was never a goal for me.

I think you are lying to yourself. It was. You even had this hyper-capitalist phase, and with corresponding values and the narrative in your posts and comments, obviously entirely aligned with the vision of a heroic highly successful sole proprietor, who is only hindered by the evil Russians / Ukrainians, the lack of chicken account. I remember what you had been saying back then. Of course autistic bit twiddling is a factor too, which now became much more central.

I think even now, in the back of your mind your have some kind of hope to blow up somehow, but only the way you want to do it, naturally, without too much exertion focus/effort wise.

>I will just go shoplifting

No computers in prison. Would be too irrational even for you.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-21 00:15 (ссылка)
But as a communist I don't believe in capitalism.
You need to be born into a rich family to succeed under capitalism.
Examples: Donald Trump, Elon Musk, etc...

A mentally ill person, like me, doesn't have any riches.
Therefore I can be only communist.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-21 00:17 (ссылка)
And yes, female hormones indeed cleared my mind.
I now understand my place and see "free market", the competition and capitalism for the great evils they are.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-21 01:00 (ссылка)
>And yes, female hormones indeed cleared my mind.

More like actual attempts to compete in the jobs market in a western country, finally, without Russians hindering you.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-21 01:05 (ссылка)
>But as a communist

This hour of the day, but not necessarily the next hour. Depends on the argument needed to conjure.

Also this is the specific kind of communism, not the orthodox one. The "give Sadkoff free shit, no social parasitism statutes" kind.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-21 15:04 (ссылка)
Well, when I get a billion of dollars I will become a capitalist.
So never.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-21 05:21 (ссылка)
>You need to be born into a rich family to succeed under capitalism.

Bunch of examples to the contrary. Also rich family's main contribution are probably good genes, that made the previous generation(s) wealthy.

You on the other hand aren't even trying to do any money making shit on the numerous online marketplace platforms that you have access to, while also having a chicken account.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-21 15:05 (ссылка)
Keep believing in working hard.
That is what slave owners want from you.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-20 21:53 (ссылка)
an important addendum: The more unattractive the male individual is, the more likely he is to do the risky shit.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-07-20 22:08 (ссылка)
The less person has to lose the higher the likelihood for that person to do risky things.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Анонимно)
2024-07-20 18:34 (ссылка)
ZadkoV is totally worthless

(Ответить)