Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет nancygold ([info]nancygold)
@ 2024-09-23 12:14:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Настроение: contemplative
Entry tags:russia, ukraine, ww3

Why I support capital punishment for all the poor people
Most people ended up convicted due to being poor.
Being poor is the result of the overpopulation,
which is the failure of economy and society.

Torturing people in prisons wont increase wealth.
It wont fix the society either.
Especially if you plan releasing convicts one day.
And I don't believe in punitive justice.

Capital punishment will solve overpopulation.
Capital punishment will solve social conflicts.
That is why I support mass executions.
They will lead to less suffering overall.
No overpopulation = no wars.

Alternatives to capital punishment?
Only if we castrate all males.
Especially the ugly lower IQ ones.
So there will be population reduction.
What Putin and Zelenksy do now can be
seen as execution of criminally stupid.



(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)


(Анонимно)
2024-09-23 14:00 (ссылка)
That's not about "overpopulation", that's about approaching the technological singularity, human obsolescence.

>not enough jobs for everyone to earn money without crime.

And that's never been the case. The Sadkovs of the past were always able to find a way to fail at getting a job, becoming homeless, dying of hunger, etc.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2024-09-23 14:56 (ссылка)
>And that's never been the case.

Always been. If the job wont provide you with enough money to rent house and buy food, you start doing crime, starting with shoplifting.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2024-09-23 15:09 (ссылка)
I meant that it's never been the case that there was "enough jobs for everyone to earn money without crime". There's always been a percentage of population on the sidelines, in some kind of destitute state.

"Overpopulation" can't be a permanent condition of humanity, it has to describe some particular state. So that definition of yours, idiotic of course, doesn't work.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Читать комментарии) -