Понять бы что происходит на картинке...

tiphareth
2024-12-01 03:59 (ссылка)
в том, что умный человек не будет здесь писать из-под анона
раз анон, значит говно и нахуй

tiphareth
2024-12-02 05:39 (ссылка)
анон это говно
обращать внимание на говно - себя не уважать
нет, не читает

>"In my definition might isn't about being largest. Might is about being able to backstab/ambush anyone. The lion is large, muscular ball, king of the animals, but with proper tools, like spears or gun you can neutralize the beast easily. Same with human society: Russia is huge, but it is weak, and it is also weak move to not eliminate a hungry lion before it mauled your babies. Don't be weak in your prediction of dangerous animals behavior."

might is might. Might is what enables winning in the end. We'll know in hindsight. This explication is without merit, since it's just your preference / potentially faulty understanding of competition dynamics/mechanics. We shouldn't consult the weak losers about how to win, right? They are the worst at knowing what enables victory.

Surprised there are no other objections, since it's basically an acknowledgement that you are both evil and weak, since it's the European humanist values that are commanding the monopoly on violence in Europe, US and beyond, and these values define the governing concepts, their words and associated meaning, and according to that you are very evil, and since you are very weak, you can do nothing about it, beside the empty proclamations of self-sovereignty.

>proclamations of self-sovereignty

to elaborate, "the opposite of good isn't evil, it's weak" is basically a declaration of self-sovereignty (you often do these in various forms) by implying there is ethics/morality/dictionary/philosophy alternative to basically any existing civilization on the planet, and you are the lone shining bearer of that. i.e. "I'm not evil, I'm just not strong enough to force you to consider me good".

Seethe and writhe Sadkov. You'll always be evil in the eyes of basically anyone, the moment you open your mouth, and you can do nothing about it.

Also, I don't understand why you refuse to embrace and acknowledge your evilness, and say honestly "Yes, I'm very evil". There are negative connotations to the word in the languages(and the word "negative" has "evil" connotations of course), but so what? Since when do you care what others say, or how others perceive you? When you say "I prefer manipulating people and keeping them ignorant" or "To be above the subhumans you have to embrace your inner alien." it doesn't get any more negative if you add "I'm evil" to that. The word "evil" just precisely, almost formally describes what you are. Why resist it?

How are you not a public enemy, if you "prefer manipulating people and keeping them ignorant"? How are you not a public enemy, if you proclaim to be "good to myself" and it's obvious from your writing that it would be at the expense of public good, of others, if need arises. You are an enemy of the people, right now mostly at the level of discourse. Although who knows, you often reveal your evil deeds, like cybercrime or shoplifting only years later, so we don't know what evil you commit right now.

>It is insult like "faggot" or "retard"

The next step is to proclaim that "enemy" is also an insult of the "faggot" or "retard" type.

>People are inanimate objects without agency.

Ok. mr evil guy.

>Sometimes ignorance is good for you.

Nobody would admit it's good if it's a result of manipulation. And taking into the account your other statements that "ignorance" isn't for the benefit of the victims of your manipulations.

>Sadkov isn't evil unless people noticed Sadkov's evil.

ok. Unfortunately for you everybody has noticed. Too late of a realization.

>I try to enlighten you
>I prefer manipulating people and keeping them ignorant

Make it make sense. Can you maintain the fucking narrative coherence at least over like 10 posts?

Here goes the "When I commit evil it's for educational, performative purposes. I'm an artist" argument.

>I can create both darkness and light

Like 99% darkness, and 1% light, and that 1% only because your escapades are funny. Maybe if the general public was as perverted as your clients, the needle would move towards 95%, but alas. Your game hasn't been released, and your solo roleplaying kludges aren't in demand. The rest is decades of toxicity, attempts to annoy people, actual crime, conflicts and so on.

>for you.

I'm pretty sure all the evil shit you did you did for yourself.

>Yes. You need evil. You need enemy to unite you

Yes, we need words to describe a phenomenon that negatively affects society and its members. In order to fight it we have to give it a name, and describe what it means. And it means you.

>You created me. I haven't created myself.

Pretty sure you are just naturally evil like most psychopaths. Nobody creates them. There is no technology not to create them. They are a natural side effect of humanity continuing itself through procreation.

What you could argue is that the society is to blame for allowing you to continue living, or continue being at large.

>and so on.

parasitism, calls to violence against authorities for refusing to give refugee status, against US border guards, potentially fraudulent sex/gender transitioning for the refugee status, disruptive behavior in NL educational institutions, threats of violence, sedition...

One day a better AI will be able summarize this shit better. There will be no escape. You should undelete your sadkov account here btw, to be better documented in history.

>Because "evil" is just a label for your enemies.

And of course it's an absurd simplification, almost to the level of meaninglessness. "Evil" and "enemy" are different words. You can talk with ChatGPT about evil in normative ethics and what not. What it means in consequentialist deontological, virtue ethics. You are especially evil according to virtue ethics, for example.

>It is insult like "faggot" or "retard"

"faggot means homosexual, and "retard" means mentally impaired, both are naturally disliked and therefore accumulated negative connotations in the language, making them derogatory. And evil isn't even considered an insult -- in no dictionary it has (taboo, derogatory) modifiers. It's a rather neutral term. And there is basically no other word for you, a person who sees no issue in harming others for your own benefit:

>"Anon: Sadkov, if bodysnatching was a thing would you commit a murder by bodysnatching a body of a beautiful woman, i.e. means of whoring production in your worldview?
Sadkov: Of course. Without second thought. There are billions of cis women."

This above is comic book villainry. A caricature almost. And I'm pretty sure you are dead serious.

You are making shit up. Evil is literally just a name on axis in almost all prevalent ethical moral systems. It's a philosophical term.

And there is nothing defamatory. "I'll kill cis women for their bodies" is literally it, according to almost all prevalent ethical/moral systems. You said it. Learn what "defamatory" means.


>pointing that such person is unwelcome

"unwelcome" is a defamatory insult, pointing that such person is bad.
And yes Sadkov, people with murderer ethics are unwelcome in any functioning society.

>"unwelcome" is a defamatory insult, pointing that such person is bad.

that was sarcasm btw, revealing the absurdity of such thesaurus chaining.

You are delusional. All the systems are looking for a way to maximize something, be it pleasure, virtue (religions, secular), or something else. And your stated beliefs and deeds are detrimental to achieving those, like rust is detrimental to steel mechanism functioning, or termite infestation is detrimental to wooden house structural integrity. These systems also define what is good, and what should be promoted, not suppressed. So "Never a friend." is just a lie. They do define their requirements for friends, and that usually doesn't include would be murderers, or unashamed parasites.

holy based

That's your typical feebleminded absurdity.

>There are no evil people, instead they are just friendly helpers educating people by example on what not to do, helping them choose the right path. Hitler was one of those.

ok. Sounds pretty insane. The usual.

>You can't maximize without a gradient.

We wouldn't need to maximize improvement of society into the directions where the likes of you are detrimental, if the likes you didn't exist.

No detrimental phenomena = no need to waste institutional and intellectual, moral ,ethical, legal, legislative, media ,propaganda , enforcement and other resources. More resources on finding and fighting other, less evil/harmful detrimental phenomena.

You adding detrimental phenomena by existing creates a waste of said resources.

Fighting arbitrary difficulties, like living in a hell with Sadkovs, instead of a paradise without Sadkovs, doesn't make progress better, more directed. It just makes everyone's life harder, and farther from higher states of civilization.

>You can't find direction without a goalpost.

Let's say Sadkovs are a venereal disease. (relevant btw, since you are a likely spreader) If venereal diseases didn't exist, there would be no need for such goal post. Such goal post existing at all is a waste of everyone's time and detriment to everyone's well being.

>Because I'm your enemy.
>I move you forward.

You are just adding detrimental phenomena to the pile of detrimental phenomena, which is in no way helpful.

>Without me you get lost in the local maxima.

We do it with intelligence, not with Sadkovs or Chikatilo.

>Therefore you need competition.

How are you a competition? How are you competing? Is famine or pollution competition? Is AIDS competition? Something inherently parasitic, that can't exist independently can't be considered a competition.

>Because I'm your enemy.

Too great of a designation for a powerless evil freak.

you aren't competition, in the abstract sense. Same for evolution, energy, thermodynamic equilibrium or any other abstract concept. Neither you are A competition, since you are fundamentally parasitic and Sadkovite civilization can't exist. You existing doesn't improve the host, it waste its resources.

>You parasitize on plants and animals you eat.

We don't claim that we improve animals to the higher levels of existence for their own benefit. We just modify them for eating them. Many breeds can't survive in the wild at this point, nor are we their competition. This is a shitty analogy, per your usual.

>You also parasitize on the cells your mitochondria has enslaved.

Humans can consent, bacteria or a chicken can't. Nobody consented to you being the nuisance you are.

>My existence makes you enraged,

Not really. I'm just exploring the inner world of psychopathic internal narratives. Turns out there is a strong internal need for euphemization.

>You need me. I'm your social glue.

Nope, you narcissist.

>And machine has to be oiled and fueled.

And you are the rust in the machine, leading to additional expenditures on machine refurbishment, and protective coatings, resulting in higher upkeep. Nothing but misallocation of resources. Technicians who refubrish the machine could have been planning mars colonization or something, instead.

>It gives purpose to your otherwise senseless life.

The same fallacy repeated. It's pretty obvious that for humanity it's much more preferable to have other challenges / goalposts / meanings. Don't be so full of yourself, the world is full of challenges without your shittiness.

And parasitism isn't the entirety of your nature, of course. It's just particularly relevant in the "I'm competition" argument. One can also say that destructiveness is your another side, especially pre-HRT.

>Same way you need Israel killing Gaza children.

And you are strawmanning me as a leftist when I'm pretty right wing, just not psychopathic right wing like you -- one has to adhere to some non-collectivist ethics in one's society of choice or birth, to make it productive and well operating, benefiting everyone, instead of being a source of malice and radical selfishness.

Но вообще это достаточно смешно -- разрабатывает идеологию вершителя судеб мира для себя, при этом являясь анальной шлюхой на пособии.

Just stop dealing with shit.

Пусть Сракодавр откроет комменты.
Ведь мы хотим там наслаждаться и прославлять отца нашего Вениамина.

Союз Детей Уважаемого Вениамина (СДУВ)

Не понял, ты чо уже типа всем масти назначил? А полномочия есть?