Войти в систему

Home
    - Создать дневник
    - Написать в дневник
       - Подробный режим

LJ.Rossia.org
    - Новости сайта
    - Общие настройки
    - Sitemap
    - Оплата
    - ljr-fif

Редактировать...
    - Настройки
    - Список друзей
    - Дневник
    - Картинки
    - Пароль
    - Вид дневника

Сообщества

Настроить S2

Помощь
    - Забыли пароль?
    - FAQ
    - Тех. поддержка



Пишет nancygold ([info]nancygold)
@ 2025-09-29 15:13:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Настроение: contemplative
Entry tags:russia, transitioning, ukraine, ww3

Who is the real enemy of a conscript?

Here is how I see it:

  • Personal transition goals → “I want to pass, stabilize my life, and reduce friction with the world.”
  • Collective political expectations → “As a trans person, you owe loyalty to the movement, to activism, to representation.”
  • External trolling/hostility → “You’ll never succeed; your effort is pointless.”

For someone like me, both the community’s expectations and the trolls’ taunts feel like different flavors of conscription. I never volunteered to be a soldier in anyone’s war, but both “sides” demand me play that role.

So when the “mobilization officers” (activist types) show up, they say:

  • “You’re trans, so you must march with us, speak for us, and uphold our narrative.”

And when the trolls show up, they say:

  • “You’ll never fully succeed, so give up or admit defeat.”

To me, both are intrusions. I just want to secure a private, livable identity — not to fight battles, not to rewrite society, not to be a mascot.

Hope that helps explain my harshness. I perceive myself as being dragged into conflicts I didn’t sign up for, while already struggling with internal challenges. So instead of aligning with one camp, I lash out at both, because for a potential conscript, all armies are the enemies.





(Добавить комментарий)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-29 15:35 (ссылка)
>my harshness.

You were always harsh and always found reasons to be harsh. That's just Sadkov.

Also no activist actually says you must do something. They ask you not to be a hindrance for others, but you insist to be publicly radically selfish.

>trolls show up

Literally one person said 3 words to a known psychopath who regularly devalues others. That shouldn't even be noted. That's a given.

(Ответить) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2025-09-29 15:38 (ссылка)
>you're a psychopath

Please stop projecting.
I don't pretend to be holy.
Compared to your camp, leftie.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-29 15:57 (ссылка)
Are you going to redefine psychopathy too? You've been literally diagnosed with it, have been showing blatant disregard for others, intent to manipulate people, readiness to murder if need be (for body, for not being expelled to Russia, etc), actual criminal behavior, proclaim you have no morality or ethics, and so on.

>Compared to your camp, leftie.

You are constantly strawmanning anons as lefties, without any basis.

Non-evil non-psychopath != leftie. It's been told to you many times. Rightwingers adhere to right wing ethics. Right wing ethics != radical selfishness.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


[info]nancygold
2025-09-29 17:00 (ссылка)
>strawmanning anons as lefties

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)


(Анонимно)
2025-09-29 17:15 (ссылка)
Yes, sadkov, whoever disagrees with you by listing facts quacks like a leftie. /s

(Ответить) (Уровень выше)


(Анонимно)
2025-10-01 17:49 (ссылка)
You will never be a woman. Just an ugly, mutilated, mentally ill man.

(Ответить)