Misha, a gde vy nashli propagandu "libertarianstva" na politicalcompass.org? Vot naprimer ottuda:



This is almost exclusively an American response, overlooking the undoubtedly libertarian tradition of European anarcho-syndicalism. It was, after all, the important French anarchist thinker Proudhon who declared that property is theft.

On the other side of the Atlantic, the likes of Emma Goldman were identified as libertarians long before the term was adopted by some economic rightwingers. And what about the libertarian collectives of the mid-late 1800s and 1960s?

Americans like Noam Chomsky can claim the label 'libertarian socialist' with the same validity that Milton Friedman can be considered a 'libertarian capitalist'.

The assumption that Social Darwinism delivers more social freedom is questionable. The welfare states of, for example, Sweden and The Netherlands, abolished capital punishment decades ago and are at the forefront of progressive legislation for women, gays and ethnic minorities - not to mention anti-censorship. Such established social democracies consistently score highest in the widely respected Freedom House annual survey on civil liberties. Their detailed checklist can be viewed at http://www.worldaudit.org/civillibs.htm . Such social developments would presumably be envied by genuine libertarians in socially conservative countries - even if their taxes are lower.

Interestingly, many economic libertarians express to us their support for or indifference towards capital punishment; yet the execution of certain citizens is a far stronger assertion of state power than taxation.


Vse ves'ma objectivno.

A teper' ponyatno - eto u vas takoj (novyj?) tezis chto "libertarianstvo" eto na samom dele Pinochet i Nigeriya i nikakikh lichnykh svobod krome kak pri socializme byt' v printsipe ne mozhet. V rezultate chego shkala "authoritarian"/"libertarian" eto prosto obman a est' tol'ko left/right.

Trudno ne soglasitsya t.k. sobstvennost' - odno iz osnovnykh sredstv prinuzhdeniya.