tiphareth: subscribe to Pewdiepie

Настроение:	tired
Музыка:	G.F. Handel Concerti Grossi Op.6 Nos.1- 6, Andrew Manze
Entry tags:	nazi, pol, revolution, smeshnoe, terror

subscribe to Pewdiepie
Самая хорошая конспирологическая теория
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/206359121/pewdiepie-youtube-account-skyrockets
как известно, народный герой Брентон Таррант закончил
свой популярный перформанс призывом подписываться
на канал Пьюдипая в Ютюбе:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-lHJZR3Gqxm24_Vd_AJ5Yw

Оказывается, расстрел муслимов в мечети был совершен
для того, чтобы Пьюдипая выперли с Ютюба, что неизбежно
приведет к социальной революции, потому что сто миллионов
подписчиков непременно восстанут и растопчут
проклятыe живозаглотные власти!

Но в целом /pol/ совершенно недоволен народным героем:
во-первых, Брентон Таррант не разоблачил жида. Во-вторых,
из-за популярного перформанса пострадает National Rifle
Association, а юзерам /pol/ будет труднее закупать оружие.

Привет

(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)

tiphareth
2019-03-18 04:49 (ссылка)

Destabilization and Accelerationism: tactics for
victory

True change and the change we need to enact only arises in the great
crucible of crisis. A gradual change is never going to achieve victory.

Stability and comfort are the enemies of revolutionary change.

Therefore we must destabilize and discomfort society where ever
possible.
A political candidate that keeps the status quo or only seeks to introduce
minimal change, even when the minimal change is in support of our
cause, is ultimately useless or even damaging. Revolutionary change is
needed and above all necessary.

It is far better to encourage radical,violent change regardless of its
origins. As only in times of radical change and social discomfort can
great and terrific change occur.

These tumultuous times can be brought about through action. For
example, actions such as voting for political candidates that radically
change or challenge entrenched systems, radicalizing public discourse by
both supporting, attacking, vilifying,radicalizing and exaggerating all
societal conflicts and attacking or even assassinating weak or less radical
leaders/influencers on either side of social conflicts.

A vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites
agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour
than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish
to enact radical change.

Canvas public areas in support of radical positions, even if they are not
your own.

Incite conflict.Place posters near public parks calling for sharia law, then
in the next week place posters over such posters calling for the expulsion
of all immigrants, repeat in every area of public life until the crisis arises.

Destabilize, then take control. If we want to radically and fundamentally
change society, then we need to radicalize society as much as possible.

DO NOT FEAR CHANGE, WE ARE CHANGE

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	kaledin 2019-03-18 11:16 (ссылка)
	>A vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour Only if you're Putin. (Ответить) (Уровень выше)

(Читать комментарии) -