tiphareth: бороться с тысячелетиями мужского насилия

Настроение:	sick
Музыка:	Fimbul - RAMNENS FERD
Entry tags:	feminism, metoo, sjw, smeshnoe

бороться с тысячелетиями мужского насилия
Новая жертва #metoo
(и первая жертва нового #metoo-законодательства в Конгрессе США)

The House Ethics Committee announced on October 23, 2019,
that it would conduct an investigation into the allegation
that Hill had an affair with a male staffer,[30] which, if
true, would be in violation of #MeToo legislation passed
in 2018.[31][32][33] On that same day, Hill sent an email
to constituents in which she admitted to an "inappropriate
relationship" with a campaign staffer before becoming a
congresswoman (hence out of scope of the Congressional
investigation) and promised to cooperate with the
Congressional ethics investigation regarding allegations
of wrongdoing as a member of Congress.[34][35]

On October 27, Hill announced via Twitter that she would
resign from Congress.

* * *

Феминистки продавили закон, что нельзя ебаться с подчиненными,
а первой жертвой оказалась конгрессмен_ка, имевшая половую
связь с женской коллегой, и брак втроем до кучи.

Guardian, естественно, возмущается, как же так, приняли
закон, чтобы бороться с тысячелетиями мужского насилия,
а жертвой стала конгрессмен_ка, которая не могла
участвовать в тысячелетних изнасилованиях, потому
что женщина и вообще ЛГБТ.

А вышло так, что феминистки, твиттерные "прогрессисты" и
прочее SJW-блядво продавили в правительстве беспрецендентное
в своем размахе репрессивное сексуальное законодательство
с тяжелейшими вмешательствами в частную жизнь, хуже, чем
при совке. То есть по факту развязали руки любителям
копаться в грязном белье и травить сексуальных девиантов,
вплоть до коллективных линчеваний за неподобающие половые
фантазии. Ясно, что любители браков втроем и прочие
гомосеки будут страдать от него в первую очередь. А кто у нас
любители браков втроем, до кучи с гомосеками и лесбиянками?
правильно, читатели Guardian. Так что я не понимаю, чему
тут возмущаться, сами просили, сами получили. Ебаные
гнусные мудаки и гниды.

Ссылочки:
http://lj.rossia.org/users/k_d_s/38390.html
https://www.redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2019/10/18/ca-rep.-katie-hill-allegedly-involved-female-staffer-2-yr-throuple-relationship
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7609835/Katie-Hill-seen-showing-Nazi-era-tattoo-smoking-BONG-NAKED.html
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/28/reporter-katie-hill-scandal-gop-060576

Интересно, этим закончится, или они только открыли сезон,
и теперь граждане прогрессивные конгрессмен_ки и конгрессмены
посыпятся один за другим как доминошки? Даже и не знаю,
злорадствовать или не злорадствовать.

Привет

(Читать комментарии) - (Добавить комментарий)

tiphareth
2019-10-29 13:15 (ссылка)

nashel
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-congress-sexual-harassment-20181212-story.html
Congress approves policy to make lawmakers personally liable for sexual harassment claims

Reporting from Washington —

Members of Congress will have to pay out of their own pockets to settle sexual and other harassment claims made against them under a compromise approved Thursday by the Senate and House.

Currently taxpayers cover the cost of settling harassment claims made against elected officials. The new policy is a bipartisan response in the #MeToo era after nearly seven months of negotiations between the House and Senate.

President Trump is expected to sign the measure, which takes effect in January.

The House had wanted lawmakers to also be liable for discrimination claims made against them.

“We believe this is a strong step toward creating a new standard in Congress that will set a positive example in our nation, but there is still more work to be done,” key House members said in a statement.

Lawmakers will have to repay the U.S. Treasury, and those who do not can have their wages, savings and even Social Security benefits garnished.

Some outside advocacy groups had blamed a handful of Republican senators for the lengthy negotiations, saying they were holding up the bill because they opposed being liable for claims made against them.

Blunt said he didn’t know of a single settlement involving a senator since the Congressional Accountability Act first set policies for how to address harassment on Capitol Hill in 1995. “So, if senators will continue to conduct themselves like they appear to have been … they may never have a settlement,” he said.

California Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Hillsborough) said the proposed policy still would hold members accountable for their behavior. That was a major driver of the bill after nine lawmakers — eight House members and one senator — resigned since last fall when sexual harassment allegations against them became public.

“Time’s up. Time is finally up,” Speier said Wednesday. Speier’s personal testimony about the harassment she suffered as a staff member on Capitol Hill was a captivating moment in spurring Congress to act. “With this bill they will no longer be able to slink away with no one knowing that they have harassed. There will be transparency, and members will be held accountable.”

The bill does not limit how much of a settlement members will be liable for, a provision the House wanted, but it caps at $300,000 how much they have to pay if a judge rules against them, which the Senate wanted.

Lawmakers will have to repay the U.S. Treasury, and those who do not can have their wages, savings and even Social Security benefits garnished.

Some outside advocacy groups had blamed a handful of Republican senators for the lengthy negotiations, saying they were holding up the bill because they opposed being liable for claims made against them.

Blunt said he didn’t know of a single settlement involving a senator since the Congressional Accountability Act first set policies for how to address harassment on Capitol Hill in 1995. “So, if senators will continue to conduct themselves like they appear to have been … they may never have a settlement,” he said.

House members have a different record. Since 2003, taxpayers have shelled out nearly $300,000 to settle 13 sexual harassment or sex discrimination claims made against a representative, according to the House Administration Committee and House Office of Compliance.

“From the members’ point of view, it just creates one more potential liability that you really have less control over how it’s dealt with,” Blunt said. “But you certainly have control over whether you create the situation that creates a need to deal with it or not.”

The compromise bill puts the House and Senate ethics committees in charge of reviewing the settlements, he said. The House had wanted an independent agency, rather than fellow lawmakers on those committees, to review the settlements. The bill also requires an annual public reporting of any settlements or awards made against members of Congress, and for the first time allows interns and fellows working on Capitol Hill to file harassment complaints.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	kaledin 2019-10-29 18:57 (ссылка)
	>policy Это не закон. Это правило внутреннего распорядка. (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

kaledin
2019-10-29 18:59 (ссылка)

Весьма разумное притом:

Members of Congress will have to pay out of their own pockets to settle sexual and other harassment claims made against them under a compromise approved Thursday by the Senate and House.

Currently taxpayers cover the cost of settling harassment claims made against elected officials.

(Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	kaledin 2019-10-29 19:01 (ссылка)
	>нельзя ебаться с подчиненными И этого, как ты видишь, там и близко нет. (Ответить) (Уровень выше)

	tiphareth 2019-10-29 19:16 (ссылка)
	поговорил с ~~коипастой~~ википедией, день прошел не зря (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	kaledin 2019-10-29 19:51 (ссылка)
	Ну типа sanity check -- мне казалось очевидным, что ты написал фигню, проверили, и правда фигня. (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	tiphareth 2019-10-29 21:08 (ссылка)
	фигня в глазу смотрящего а полемизировать с википедией - занятие из серии "в Интернете кто-то неправ" (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	kaledin 2019-10-29 21:27 (ссылка)
	О чем тут полемизировать? Все совершенно ясно. (Ответить) (Уровень выше) (Ветвь дискуссии)

	(Анонимно) 2019-10-30 06:09 (ссылка)
	Вербицкий Мойша — молодец, Политик, лидер и борец! Свободу слова не просрал — Анонов нахуй в бан послал! (Ответить) (Уровень выше)

(Читать комментарии) -