>Ensuring that characters of all colors are represented in game is not censorship.

It's censorship of non-woke games. It's perfectly simple. If there is a narrative consultant, disability consultant, they are there to push/enforce certain viewpoint.

And it's as if you don't have any core. You oscillate between positions, and argue all of them, driven by a whim of the moment. A perennial hypocrite. This same transgender person (not transsexual, per ideology) would have ate you with shit for everything you've said and plan to do in your game.

>It has to unite

Who said that? Who ordered that? Это эквивалент "в каждой организации должен быть политрук, чтобы не было брожения умов".

Who said the nation can't dissolve if the people within it find it uncomfortable to live together? Западные страны вообще-то на бумаге либеральные демократии со свободой слова, Америка по крайней мере. In theory there is no limits on the narrative and representation that the actual game developers choose beside demand and public backlash, potential deplatforming. Want to target game to asians, it's their right. If they want to maximize profits, then they target game to whites(european aesthetic, less ethnic representation), because in the west (especially in Europe) they are still the absolute majority. Increasing representation doesn't necessarily increase profits, it often lowers them. So the shit they are pushing is mostly ideological, to appease the "gaming journalists". Some might find the situation where the universally woke gaming "journalists" (who nobody reads / listens to btw) created an artificial demand for censorship to be rightfully unpleasant.

>That is the reason they dumb down gameplay

They don't dumb down the gameplay to unite the nation, they do it to make it playable by children and by the people to the left side of the IQ distribution.

>To make it accessible

Making it accessible isn't uniting the nation.

There is an argument to make that the zoomers in the west are so deeply brainwashed with wokeness and muttness that there indeed a natural demand for this shit, and a need for a political consultant who would ensure that "non-offensiveness" isn't violated. Not sure about it. I doubt it.

The truth is, I think, is that regular writers, with the title "writer", not a variant of "woke consultant", are perfectly capable of feeling the zeitgeist, their environment and their culture, and do something that wouldn't endanger their carrer, without these people whose title is basically "political commissar" or "a person with neovagina".

>My game is not targeted at anyone.

It doesn't matter. You still defend a complete toxic parasite, who would have destroyed your life without any regrets.

>If she attacks me in an editorial piece, that will only give me PR.

That's assuming you have nothing to lose. But it isn't guaranteed that you'll have nothing to lose in the future. There is a non-zero chance. These people will come when you have something to lose, and make you lose it. Situational "morality" of yours (if it can be called that) is just dumb and hypocritical. "I'll change my opinion by then into diametrically opposed one" is probably what you think, but that's a psycho behavior.

>already destroyed by

Mostly by your own self by being too self-centered, impulsive, psychopathic, and not very smart. Ideology didn't play any significant role here.

Again that's right now. If your game takes off, you'll have something to lose, and won't need to shoplift.

It can take of without being designed to take off, against your wishes. Sometimes it happens.

But it's fucking amazing how you do everything to suffer, and than blame other people for your suffering.

Woke games also suffer from being boring and unexciting, too smoothed out. The visceral human experience that feels real can't be unoffensive. So these people literally enshittify the product.

For example the recent Space Marine game, which was pretty woke in it's representation, by including a black person and an asian into marines (somehow all cloned from the god emperor per the overarching narrative), wasn't particularly woke in its content -- masculinity, brotherhood, self-sacrifice, human-human violence, blood etc.

>why wont you join SVO or ATO?

Does this have to be explained? Because partly experiencing some shit, like life threatening danger in a horror movie, titillating one's senses just enough but not too much, AND WITHOUT any actual danger to yourself, is the attraction of entertainment media. If watching an action movie carried a danger of getting shot, or watching an Alien movie carried a danger of getting a facehugger onto your face with chestburster implanted into you, there wouldn't be many takers, even if it is quite exciting.

You should join these things. Probably the ATO, considering your russophobic past and present. You've said many times that you are one of the mainliest trans persons. So Ukrainian army is the perfect place for you for putting what you preach into action.

Only a man enough to be a "russophobe" against chickens.

I mean roosters, not chicken accounts.

btw, у кого-нибудь сохранилось the chicken account video?

The game itself is mediocre in all aspects -- linear, boring, extremely generic. The presence of "consultants" who are there because of their identity is one of the reasons, but of course not the main.

No. It's mediocre among the action games. You are neurologically incapable of understanding it, so relax.

It's just a dimension of human experience which is inaccessible to you.

>inaccessible to you.

Like feelings love, friendship, comradery, and many other normal human feelings and experiences.

СЛУШАЙТЕ, ДА Я ПРОСТО ХОЧУ ЧТОБЫ МАЛЬЧИШКИ МЕНЯ В ПОПУ ВЫЕБАЛИ ПО ОЧЕРЕДИ!

Михаил Додик Шварц, программист ПНД "Хуйлашки" (Гродно).

Приболел наверна обвафленной кропалик, простата измучала, печень пошаливает, почке нахуй отваливаюца; в таком возрасте инторнеты смерти подобны га га.